What, you expected a positive response?

You do realise most people detest ticket touts?

As Alan Partridge would say, "Scum. Sub-human scum."

I think that's a sweeping generalisation.

The reliance on the internet and phone lines has somehow convinced people that there is no alternative way to buy tickets.. My point hightlights the fact that if you queue up, you can generally get what you want, in more ways than one.

..and if someone wants something so much, they will get it.

Rubbish. Don't pretend you're providing a service or are some essential part of the supply chain. You're not.

You're a scab. A parasite doing nothing more than ripping people off, people who probably couldn't get tickets only because filthy scabs like you had snapped up massive numbers of tickets in the first place.

Yes, some people will pay well over the odds for an event. But they shouldn't have to so you can make a few pennies.

Don't like the truth? Don't rip people off and brag about it.

...on the other hand its the rule of supply and demand in its purest form.

Think sideways for a minute as you all tend to get rather sensitive when it comes to the thought of gig tickets for your favourite band - lets apply the rule to paperback books, lets assume that there is a release tomorrow of a popular novel in paperback and that its release is restricted to just a few thousand books and only available in Waterstones or Waterstones online.

What would you say now to those who buy ten copies and then sell them on at a premium (and find a market ready and willing to pay double or quadruple the face value), especially if the book can be read online (which most books can if you live in my postal area), would you be quite so critical or would you dismiss the issue as "the market in action".

I don't see it any different. It's basically denying fans the chance to purchase something at the RRP and taking advantage of the fact they are fans and forcing them to pay more than the RRP. Of course they don't have to buy it but where does that leave them? Without the book by their favourite author that they really want to read, that's where.

You don't "force" anyone to buy anything that they don't want, no-one ever bought a ticket (or any other product) from a reseller with a gun pointed at their head especially a product in the entertainment genre where you can pay a fraction of the reseller price (or free) to watch the same product online rather than live - yes its not the same "experience" but THAT is what you pay the premium for and THAT is what your free choice in the matter is all about.

Criticising resellers who are not doing anything illegal (despite what the originators of the tickets may try to enforce) is simply criticising the capitalist way of life, where everything you buy has had a markup, or several markups, applied.

You mean the same pre-sale and priority schemes the touts use?

But in most areas of the economy the markup does actually include something extra. For instance whilst Tesco charges the consumer more for the products they sell than what they pay the supplier they are doing something beneficial to you. They're making those products more easily available to you by bringing them to a shop near to where you live.

With ticket touts/resellers they aren't doing anything extra. The tickets are just as easily available from the supplier (artist/venue/production/whatever) than they are from the ticket touts/resellers. The touts/resellers aren't bringing anything extra and simply making a profit from doing nothing.

If the supplier (artist/venue/whatever) wants to use the supply & demand format to its full extent they could charge more than they currently release the tickets for (as the price is then jacked up by the touts/resellers afterwards). At least then that profit would be going to a person/organisation who's created something in the economy.

Personally I think that tickets for any events/gigs etc shouldn't be allowed to be resold over their face value. It would stop the touts/resellers buying up tickets on spec and open it up to the public more.

You've just answered your own question - when the tickets are just as easily available from the original supplier then you will find no reseller business to be had, its when there are NO tickets available from the original supplier that the reselling operation kicks in, or when purchasing tickets from a reseller is just more convenient - for instance you missed out online & couldn't take time off work to go queue for them, so you buy them on the night on the street from some dodgy geezer.



I thought they were already doing a fine job of that, when a friend of mine told me that he'd just shelled out £170 to see Fleetwood Mac next summer I thought he'd bought a whole block of tickets and was going to ask him how many he had and if there were any spares - turned out that he'd just bought two tickets, its personal choice of course and I suspect that the promoter would have sold those tickets at double that price had he only had the balls to ask, but when Fleetwood Mac started out in the 1960s did they ever believe that one day their live shows would only be viewed by millionaires?



Welcome to capitalism and if you are looking for sympathy to your cause from this current government then good luck with that.

Blimey, do you get this annoyed when paying for petrol in a built up area?

It was already mentioned earlier on in the the thread, Ticketmaster OWN a company that provides a reseller service. If there was no demand for these things, the supply would dry up and no doubt the law would reflect this change.

That's the issue. Modern touts aren't simply servicing a gap in the market as you describe, they're actually creating their own market buy buying in bulk and denying fans a fair shot at a ticket in the first instance. The Monty Python tour is a good example - within a few hours of tickets going on sale, nearly 6,000 were online at massively inflated prices. 6,000 tickets lost to genuine fans, who then have to enter the dirty world of touting and line the pockets of some rip-off merchant if they really want to go.

That's the modern norm and happens to varying degrees for every big gig.

Many of these tout firms are using netbots to bypass security protocols and buy in bulk. A genuine reselling market - ie, if someone has a ticket but can't attend for some reason - is something else entirely and while there is clearly a market for that, I suspect it's relatively small.

As mentioned above, a genuine reselling market is something else entirely, and of course there is some demand for that.

What you parasites are doing is nothing more than ripping people off to line your own pockets. It's not a service, it's opportunist profit-making at the expense of normal people. I blame the government in part for not having the balls or nouse to get a grip and until they do, nasty little people like you will continue to scam people out of money.

I rate you no better than the 'travellers' who use 'driveway resurfacing scams' to rip off the vulnerable.

Haven't most venues and concert promoters pretty much outsourced nearly all ticketing arrangements for concerts to ticket companies anyway? I'm going to a concert at the o2 Academy in Leeds next year. I bought the ticket from eventim simply because it came up as a promoted link when I was doing a search. I just went and checked if I overpaid by trying the o2 Academy website. Trying to buy from the o2 website sends you straight to ticketweb, a company owned by Ticketmaster.

My guess is that online ticket companies pay a very high percentage of the ticket price straight to the venues and promoters. Their basic costs are pretty much covered with their annoying booking charges, but the major profits will be made by charging ridiculous prices for the first few rows and for last minute tickets. I don't think venues were ever in a position to do that so they are happy to have the separation.