And lets not forget, the "coloureds" that they so quaintly referred to were in the main, all British passport holders from Empire countries with an absolute right to be here, it was merely the colour of their skin that caused such campaigns.

Those aged under 40 years of age can maybe see now just what a progression it was from the 1960s to the Race Relations Act of 1976.

And don't forget - this poster was issued at a time when apartheid was prevalent and totally legal in a lot of States in the US.

rlAn object lesson in how to get the Home Office chasing their own tails until they disappear up their own a[ir[/iseholesrl

They can hardly say that when their last PM declared "British jobs for British workers".

Plastered all over a van driving around specific areas?
I must have missed that.

Or maybe you've missed the point of this thread?

Nah, just at the Labour party conference, transmitted round the country.

Thanks for confirming that you don't understand the difference.

And thanks for confirming you don't read what people write just what you'd like to see. Carry on.

Oh, I read what you posted all right.
It's clear that you either can't or won't see the difference between a speech calling for an increase in modern manufacturing etc "[idrawing on the talents of all to create British jobs for British workers[/i" and this stupid poster about illegal immigrants.
A silly parallel.

Why not "jobs for workers"? Take your time.

Dearie me.
In a speech about what he sees as the next stage for Britain ... Britain (as he puts it) leading the global economy ... about Britain being the fifth largest economy ... about Britain being a world leader in various sectors ... about job creation in manufacturing in Britain? ...

Notice the theme?
Clue, it's not immigration.