Did this not answer you sufficiently: "The other (many) moments of laughter from the debate on Friday, have not been edited out and replaced with applause when clip were shown for a second time."

It's all that your getting and I'm sorry that you missed the first clip

Did this not answer you sufficiently: "The other (many) moments of laughter from the debate on Friday, have not been edited out and replaced with applause when clip were shown for a second time."

It's all that your getting and I'm sorry that you missed the first clip

It loses something without the laughter but, you may not have spotted the difference

No - it's only relevant if it happened; and in this case, the clip they showed was deliberately misrepresented, because they showed Johnson's strong words, but edited out the context of a room full of people laughing in scorn. If they'd shown clips of the other leaders words leading up to laughter, but edited out the laughter, you might have the faintest trace of a point.

And this is the state broadcaster by the way, who also 'accidentally' used old footage of Johnson at the cenotaph, which conveniently airbrushed out his embarrassing gaffe and showed him in a more positive light; the same event btw that last year, saw Corbyn vilified for his choice of coat, gleefully replayed over and over again, by the same state broadcaster.

You can explain away this stuff all you like - and it may wash in your own echo chamber - but it's self-evidently and clearly wrong; positively Orwellian in fact:

"The party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears. It was their final, most essential command."

The big issuesBUT...BUT...THEY EDITED THE LIVE VERSION OF LEADER'S QT AND SOME PEOPLE DIDN'T SEE ONE SECOND OF A FEW PEOPLE LAUGHING AND THAT WAS THE BIG MOMENT I WANTED EVERYONE TO SEEEEE"

I hope they don't edit Andrew Neil from tonight - Corbyn didn't actually answer one question - oh he did on the WASPI - a mix of government reserves and borrowing and then admitted the government reserves were a fraction of what would be required. He couldn't answer what % of the total income tax was paid by the top 1% and he wanted to suggest that removing the married tax allowance was some way of equalising society!! Less said about anti-Semitism the better

For the first time he looked out of his depth - a shocking performance.

That was just astounding. Corbyn way out of his depth, evasive as ever, clearly rattled and utterly unconvincing. Eye-rolling & huffing throughout. If Prince Andrew was a car crash, that was an M6 pile-up into both carriageways.

He simply can't hide his loyalties. Wouldn't apologise for antisemitism, wouldn't give the go-ahead to kill an ISIS leader. We all know he's refused to condemn the IRA killings before. Won't answer questions, gets his tax sums wrong. Thinks £60 billion can be found for WASPI 'just because it needs doing'.

Neil always jumps in a lot but he does his best to cut off pointless soundbites and push hard for answers. He does it with everyone. That's why he's good at his job.

Yes, Corbyn eventually answered on WASPI - but by my count he was asked SEVENTEEN times before getting some form of wishy-washy answer.

All irrelevant guys

Corbyn stops a hard right wing fascist Brexit.

End of.

Nope because I couldn't care less. Genuinely don't give a sht. Honestly, right now I care more whether I can be arsed having another drink before bed. Just as I don't actually give a toss about the "conspiracy" of Johnson's "missing" second of laughter, as I've said before several times. It's all utterly irrelevant. You love it simply because it validates your views and later on you can cry to anyone who will put up with you that it's all a conspiracy.

Don’t get too carried away because Johnson turn is still to come and I expect the interviewer will have a lot of ammunition to upset him. You can tell when he is lying his mouth is open.