In twenty-odd thousand posts spread over more than a decade I think I've mentioned my background maybe three or four times. If this makes me "very insecure" I'm not going to lose sleep about it. Moreover, since I'm one of only two people who has been a member of this board since it was first activated I think I'm in a pretty good position to draw conclusions about it. This site is the most successful rugby league resource on the planet bar none. Over the years sin bin traffic has repeatedly waxed and waned and whilst it is currently experiencing a trough this is nothing new. The last exodus occurred whilst I was away for a couple of years so you have a tough task blaming it on me.

For your information there are no "protected" posters beyond the owners of the site (who pay its CONSIDERABLE bills and moderators whose services we cannot do without). As for my supposed "intolerance" - if you can find an owner or moderator who over the last ten years has banned fewer people than me I'll buy you a Grand Final ticket. I was the only person who consistently fought to retain the sin bin when just about everyone wished to cut it. There is ONE thread on a site containing MILLIONS which was created precisely because people who wished to discuss alternative explanations for events such as Paris were being targeted for abuse and it became impossible to engage in discussion. The fact that you choose to completely ignore this fact really doesn't do your argument any favours.

If you don't like this forum or the site in general don't come. I'm not forcing anyone to be here and I'll gladly hold the door for your exit.

As for whether a senior ex-Pentagon staffer is allowed to publish documentation - why don't you check this fact before denying the possibility entirely (based on what evidence?). You could start with the video link in which said impossibility is plastered across the screen. You could then check the Mary Ferrell website which is the single best repository of published government material...

.

In my eyes Mugwump hasn't stepped out of line here. He simply replied back in the same manner he was goaded with in the first place. He doesn't sound insecure to me if you read the post properly. He was merely stating how secure his life is through having the mind-set he chooses to believe in. Doesn't sound insecure, if anything it proves to me his life seems indeed very stable. Whats so belittling about that FFS grow up. With regards to chastising and belittling, the OP got what he deserved with his continual stick poking.

There's nothing wrong with this thread, it's alive and kicking why shut it down ?. You want it shut down because the alternative media is diluting the bull spoon fed to the head in the sand brigade who can't stomach the cognitive dissonance of another viewpoint. Nobody has had anything to say against the free thinkers with regards to a debate, you revert to brain insults and complaints like the above. You're pathetic

As stated earlier, I have an open mind on Paris stretching as far back as Charlie Hebdo. I didn't watch any of the TV reports (aside from ten minutes) and I've avoided the newspapers entirely. I mean, I've got plenty of suspicions but without time to investigate they're precisely that.

Whether I agree with its opinions or not it strikes me that one group of people here is actually attempting to understand what took place in Paris whilst the other has brought absolutely nothing to the debate and sought only to attack the other group from the outset.

The fact that the latter group is always the first to scream "intolerance" simply demonstrates the enormous degree of self-deception taking place.

Ahhh there's a surprise, Mugwumps alter ego along to defend him. How predictable mug Stanley. People have offered plenty of debate, but you ignore it every single time and copy and paste more from your crackpot websites.

As for insults, you oh and muggers have thrown out a number of your own. Perhaps the most childish being calling me a stalker when I attempt to DEBATE your points.

Ha ha ha you're not capable of a decent debate on this topic, you've not once in this thread added or supplied any significant piece of evidence to support your views, all you do is repeat and splutter the same toxic sentences trying to derail and ridicule the alternative viewpoint without any substance. Just to prove a point i'll give you what you want, my undivided attention. So come on lets debate ?. I'm saying St Bernardino was a fully blown hoax. Paris was a false flag with a semi hoax. Go for it you've won my undivided attention.

I can't say I've not had a great deal of fun encouraging the idea simply by staying silent - but I have to say there are quite a few people in here who really are flattering themselves thinking I care so much about their opinion I'd waste time creating alternate accounts so I can engage in some kind of schizoid debate.

For the record - the last alternate account I used:

Username: Vapid
Created: Sat Jan 12, 2002 12:08 am
Last active: Sun Mar 19, 2006 12:49 am
Posts: 56

Seriously folks. You're not worth the effort.

Ha ha ha. A schitzoid debate. I Can't think of anything more hilarious'. Its worse than playing Chess on your own.

Schitzoid debate hilarious pmsl

On the other hand I do know of at least THREE alternative accounts regularly posting in this forum. Once again, who is kidding who here?

I'm presuming Flat Stanley is 'theearthisflat' from the other lunatic thread. Pointless trying to debate with people who's ideas are so fractured from reality. It's their way or no way.

Do you mean 1 x Person with 3 Alias. and all three Alias post in this forum ?

Here the trouble causer. You care to add any decent dialogue on this topic . Nah didn't think so..bye byespace cadet

I'm afraid I'm not allowed to divulge personal details. Pesky laws and such.

But in the vain hope it'll put an end to this tiresome nonsense I'll happily agree to transfer £100 via PayPal to anyone who can prove I've used an alternative account in this (or any other) forum this decade.

If half the things I'm routinely accused of are true this shouldn't be a difficult question to answer ...

I reckon JML is The Butcher.They're always stalking and rapid to antagonise my beliefs. And when i challenge a debate they both do one.

EDITED