It's ok though because big Dave says it is working!

rlhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-23489925rl

Like IDS, he doesn't need statistics to prove it because it's "clear that this is already working". I mean, you'd be an idiot to think that those pesky illegal immigrants wouldn't leave on their own without reading an advert on the side of a van, in English!

So, basically, you're a bit of a hypocrite then with double standards based on nothing more than relative wealth.

It didn't read like that to me.
He was comparing people who come here to work and make a life for themselves against very rich people who take advantage of illegal immigrants to pay less than the going rate.
The former can deserve sympathy, the latter can't.

HMRC are up on the deal, here's the van they're driving around Chelsea & Westminster

Genuine tory poster from 1964



Not a lot has changed really

And lets not forget, the "coloureds" that they so quaintly referred to were in the main, all British passport holders from Empire countries with an absolute right to be here, it was merely the colour of their skin that caused such campaigns.

Those aged under 40 years of age can maybe see now just what a progression it was from the 1960s to the Race Relations Act of 1976.

And don't forget - this poster was issued at a time when apartheid was prevalent and totally legal in a lot of States in the US.

rlAn object lesson in how to get the Home Office chasing their own tails until they disappear up their own a[ir[/iseholesrl

They can hardly say that when their last PM declared "British jobs for British workers".

Plastered all over a van driving around specific areas?
I must have missed that.

Or maybe you've missed the point of this thread?

Nah, just at the Labour party conference, transmitted round the country.

Thanks for confirming that you don't understand the difference.

And thanks for confirming you don't read what people write just what you'd like to see. Carry on.

Oh, I read what you posted all right.
It's clear that you either can't or won't see the difference between a speech calling for an increase in modern manufacturing etc "[idrawing on the talents of all to create British jobs for British workers[/i" and this stupid poster about illegal immigrants.
A silly parallel.

Why not "jobs for workers"? Take your time.

Dearie me.
In a speech about what he sees as the next stage for Britain ... Britain (as he puts it) leading the global economy ... about Britain being the fifth largest economy ... about Britain being a world leader in various sectors ... about job creation in manufacturing in Britain? ...

Notice the theme?
Clue, it's not immigration.