Quote: Durham Giant "Even now you still try to defend your indefensible position. Your view simplified is that It was so obvious that more would come out in the wash that it was a ridiculous and obvious thing to say'"
Not a view, a statement of simple fact. And thus in no need of "defence" any more than stone needs defence against being called stone.
Quote: Durham Giant "Yet when someone states the obvious you start an 8 page thread '"
Are you a moderator? Seriously? Then you need to get a better hang on how a forum works. I "made a post". Neither I nor anyone "starts an 8 page thread". Threads run into pages due to the number of people who are interested in the subject and who make posts on the subject. The more interest, the more replies, the more pages. So what are you talking about?
That aside, it is ironic - and makes you look really stupid - to say
I started the thread. I only came in on PAGE ELEVEN, whereas you yourself had been regularly expounding your views for the previous ten.
Quote: Durham Giant " accusing someone of stating the obvious of being a conspiracy theorist.'"
Are you too thick to stop conflating those two separate things however many times I point your error out? I did not "accuse" R. of being a conspiracy theorist, his post did that for him.
Quote: Durham Giant "Yet the reality is simple as more comes out in the wash we will see the truth or more of the truth about what happened such as the contents of letter NO2 which details how Ms Saldanha felt about the hospital managements actions.'"
And? All I took issue with was R's nutty dark conspiracy hints. The seeming fact that Mrs Saldanha was upset with hospital management is irrelevant to his supposed conspiracy. Or indeed to my comments, since I've pointed out more than once that there was reason to believe she was upset with the hospital management.
Quote: Durham Giant "That will tell us about where the responsibility or blame lies maybe a little less against the two DJs and a bit more about the role of the hospital managers and the role of the radio station managers.'"
Indeed it may. But as from the outset I have personally attributed the lion's share of the blame to the radio station managers, rather than the DJs, and still do, why are you telling me?
Quote: Durham Giant "At the time of RS post many on here were quick to blame the two DJS solely for what happened. Some of us thought that was a bit simplistic.'"
Indeed. Except you forgot that I was probably the first of "us" to say that?
Quote: Durham Giant "Sounds like there is still a lot more to come out in the wash or am i stating the obvious and likely to be labelled a conspiracy theorist'"
You really need to stop conflating those two separate issues in your head. It is not worth pointing it out to you again. Only you can choose to finally grasp the point, if you wish.