In your words: "I dont think there is any conspiracy but there is more to this story".

Why do I feel I need to add a 'nudge-nudge, wink-wink' at the end of that?

"I'm not racist but..."

I suspect that whilst most of us will have a fairy or star atop our Christmas tree, in the case of Cronius or FA, it'll be a sparkly straw man.

I believe details will emerge, but nothing too exciting. Yet there you go again, implying "there is more to this" with a conspiratorial wink.

Yours will be an MI6 agent with a chloroform-soaked hankie, no doubt.

At least the 'conspiratorial theorists' help to balance out the 'blame gamers'.

Perhaps it would be, if that was someone's argument. It isn't. You must know this, if you can read. As your echo Rumpelstiltskin would say, you are putting up a whopping great straw man. What excuse have you got for falsely conflating these two completely separate propositions, when the point has been explained ad nauseam?

And which "straw man", exactly, would that be then? Do you actually know what one is?

Tip: you'd look less foolish if you either addressed the points put to you, rather than play to an imaginary gallery, or if you can't deal with debate, then STFU.