The majority agree with me, best to leave us all in our ignorance.

So its all Mark Duggans mothers fault, if she hadnt got pregnant all those years ago , there wouldnt have been any riots

All sorted

I did mention a few pages back that he was a nutter.

Didn't expect him to demonstrate it so aptly though.

C can still happen without A.
C could depend on B.
C could happen independently of both A and B.
They are all possibilities.
Would you accept that just from a mathematical point of view (or logical point of view)?
If you accept that, you can't definitely say A caused C.

Love how when people are losing an argument on this messageboard they immediately resort to dishing out abuse.

It's funny because it seems like it's the mods who do it most often, aren't they the ones supposed to be enforcing the rules?

I bet if I was to start dishing it out in response then I would be first to get banned too.

I've already had a 'warning' off a moderator for him abusing me?!

If you don't agree with my points, debate it out. Don't just start dishing out abuse. It really is quite immature that you can't construct an argument without resorting to abuse.

There is a difference between debating and repeating your (badly thought out) point until people are sick of it. Several posters have pointed out the flaw in your pointg yet you still think you are right. Oh and the addy you need is admin@rlfans.com.

There is a difference between debating and repeating your (badly thought out) point until people are sick of it. Several posters have pointed out the flaw in your pointg yet you still think you are right. Oh and the addy you need is admin@rlfans.com.

The only thing true in your argument is that A happened first.
If you were the person charged with coming up with the cause/s of the riots (assuming you were capable of doing that job) then I think that you would be more open to the possibilities and not just dive into what happened first as the cause (bad as it was).

Quote: Big Graeme "There is a difference between debating and repeating your (badly thought out) point until people are sick of it. Several posters have pointed out the flaw in your pointg yet you still think you are right. Oh and the addy you need is Thank you. If you had read the thread, you will see that numerous people have agreed with my viewpoints. If people are sick of the debate then don't visit the thread any more, I don't force people to read my posts and I'm not forced to read others posts. What I don't do is dish out abuse for no apparent reason. I'm a grown up.

Quote: Big Graeme "There is a difference between debating and repeating your (badly thought out) point until people are sick of it. Several posters have pointed out the flaw in your pointg yet you still think you are right. Oh and the addy you need is Thank you. If you had read the thread, you will see that numerous people have agreed with my viewpoints. If people are sick of the debate then don't visit the thread any more, I don't force people to read my posts and I'm not forced to read others posts. What I don't do is dish out abuse for no apparent reason. I'm a grown up.

Erm, no they haven't, yet again your comprehension is lacking.



Act like it then.

Erm yes they have. 'World of Redboy' and 'Smokey TA' I think.



You disagreed with my opinion so you dished out abuse.

Who is the one acting like a child?

Much as I would love to think the various personalities of Smokey count as numerous, two agreeing with you hardly qualifies and I'd start to worry if WoR agrees with me too.

A few agreed with me and a few disagreed, it's called debate.

I'd love to.

But you won't, simply repeating the same crackpot standpoint is not debate, its Violet Elizabeth Bott foot stomping of the highest order, akin to sticking your fingers in your ears and singing "La-la-la-la" when the grown ups talk.

Erm that's all the people who disagree with me do.

But it's ok for them to do that isn't it, if you agree with them?

Antoher one who talks about grown ups and then resorts to abuse the first chance he gets. How ironic.

I tried to look at a timeline of the whole riots, and this is what I found. rlhttps://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-14436499rl Going on what what they've written, the riots in other parts of the country were a reaction to how the police had handled the riot in Tottenham. But without the death of Mark duggan, there would have been no protest march to the Police station or the rumour of a woman being attacked by police, or people setting fire to cars close to the police station and it kicking off from there.