FORUMS > The Sin Bin > Going from PAYE to contract.Help please! |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Big Graeme "That is what I pay an Umbrella company for, it is the only way to work if you fall under the IR35 directive, a directive which is the clearest bit of legislation HMRC have ever devised BTW.
It is quite clear if you fall into one of the IR35 list of employment, if you do you can either work as a contractor under PAYE on a short term contract or as a contractor working for an agency which is what an umbrella company is, you can not be self employed and many companies will no longer deal with self owned limited companies. There is very little grey in this area and very little that HMRC will pick apart if you use a reputable company.'"
An umbrella company is not the only way to work in respect of earnings from relationships caught by IR35. You can operate through your own company.
"It is quite clear if you fall into one of the IR35 list of employment" - what list is that? There is no specific list. It comes down to the specifics of the relationship between contractor and "client."
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 2874 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Karlos "
Just one other question. I saw on one site a write up on the pros and cons of umbrellas , sole tradering, etc and a couple of them said "not advisable if you will earn over 35k". Why is this?'"
The £35k figure is important because that is the threshold for the basic rate of tax at 20%. Anything you earn over £35k will be taxed at 40%.
So, if you earn £50k then on PAYE you'd pay 20% tax on the first £35k and 40% tax on the other £15k.
In a limited company you would pay yourself a salary of say £34,999 to make sure you are a basic rate tax payer. Then, assuming no other costs, your company would have a pre-tax profit of £15,001 (i.e. £50,000 minus £34,999). The company would pay 20% corporation tax at that level of profit. So the £15k profit becomes £12k after tax.
Because you are a basic rate taxpayer, you can then pay yourself a shareholder dividend of the £12k completely tax free.
As an example, a person on £50k on PAYE would have net earnings of around £35k after tax and NI. A limited company on £50k would give you net income of around £38.5k.
But as BG says, you must be very wary of the IR35 rules otherwise you could end up with a substantial bill for back tax.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Derwent "The £35k figure is important because that is the threshold for the basic rate of tax at 20%. Anything you earn over £35k will be taxed at 40%.
So, if you earn £50k then on PAYE you'd pay 20% tax on the first £35k and 40% tax on the other £15k.
In a limited company you would pay yourself a salary of say £34,999 to make sure you are a basic rate tax payer. Then, assuming no other costs, your company would have a pre-tax profit of £15,001 (i.e. £50,000 minus £34,999). The company would pay 20% corporation tax at that level of profit. So the £15k profit becomes £12k after tax.
Because you are a basic rate taxpayer, you can then pay yourself a shareholder dividend of the £12k completely tax free.
As an example, a person on £50k on PAYE would have net earnings of around £35k after tax and NI. A limited company on £50k would give you net income of around £38.5k.
But as BG says, you must be very wary of the IR35 rules otherwise you could end up with a substantial bill for back tax.'"
If you pay yourself the £12,000 dividend in the same fiscal year as you take the £34,999 then you will NOT remain a basic rate taxpayer. The dividend will create a higher rate personal tax liability of £3,000 payable via your self-assessment Return.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 26578 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Apr 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
|
Quote: Dally "An umbrella company is not the only way to work in respect of earnings from relationships caught by IR35. You can operate through your own company.
"It is quite clear if you fall into one of the IR35 list of employment" - what list is that? There is no specific list. It comes down to the specifics of the relationship between contractor and "client."'"
I should have used the word band rather than list, a decent explanation of current IR35 implementation is here www.hmrc.gov.uk/ir35/guidance.pdf
IMO there are ways of avoiding the charges an umbrella company make but for the average contractor the benefits outweigh the costs, they will use HMRC best practice advice to keep their clients compliant with tax law without the contractor having to be (or employ) a tax expert.
An accountant may be able to save a few quid when compared to an umbrella but that may involve flying closer to the sun than I am comfortable with.
|
|
Quote: Dally "An umbrella company is not the only way to work in respect of earnings from relationships caught by IR35. You can operate through your own company.
"It is quite clear if you fall into one of the IR35 list of employment" - what list is that? There is no specific list. It comes down to the specifics of the relationship between contractor and "client."'"
I should have used the word band rather than list, a decent explanation of current IR35 implementation is here www.hmrc.gov.uk/ir35/guidance.pdf
IMO there are ways of avoiding the charges an umbrella company make but for the average contractor the benefits outweigh the costs, they will use HMRC best practice advice to keep their clients compliant with tax law without the contractor having to be (or employ) a tax expert.
An accountant may be able to save a few quid when compared to an umbrella but that may involve flying closer to the sun than I am comfortable with.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 2874 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Dally "If you pay yourself the £12,000 dividend in the same fiscal year as you take the £34,999 then you will NOT remain a basic rate taxpayer. The dividend will create a higher rate personal tax liability of £3,000 payable via your self-assessment Return.'"
If you time things right you can have the dividend tax free and then adjust salary for the new year to take into account the income derived from it and get maximum value from your basic rate allowance.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 14845 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2021 | Jul 2021 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Derwent "If you time things right you can have the dividend tax free and then adjust salary for the new year to take into account the income derived from it and get maximum value from your basic rate allowance.'"
Yes, but if you consistently earn £35,000+ that does not work if you wish to draw all the money out.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 14395 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | May 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote: Derwent "As an example, a person on £50k on PAYE would have net earnings of around £35k after tax and NI. A limited company on £50k would give you net income of around £38.5k.'"
Well it might not be on the Vodafone scale of tax avoidance but this is certainly no different from a moral standpoint. More legalised tax avoidance.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1651 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2003 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jan 2018 | Sep 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Dally "Yes, but if you consistently earn £35,000+ that does not work if you wish to draw all the money out.'"
This is the quandary i have to be honest. Would this mean I would be better paying myself 35k a year and then leaving the rest of my earnings in the business account or would i then be hammered for other taxes etc.
Sorry if these are obvious questions everyone but its the first time ive had to work like this.
Thanks for all you posts as well everyone!
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 5064 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Aug 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Sep 2017 | Feb 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Derwent "In a limited company you would pay yourself a salary of say £34,999 to make sure you are a basic rate tax payer. Then, assuming no other costs, your company would have a pre-tax profit of £15,001 (i.e. £50,000 minus £34,999). The company would pay 20% corporation tax at that level of profit. So the £15k profit becomes £12k after tax.
'"
Wouldn't a limited company also have to pay VAT on the services it provides?
Quote: Derwent "Well it might not be on the Vodafone scale of tax avoidance but this is certainly no different from a moral standpoint. More legalised tax avoidance.'"
Yup. Just like paying into a pension by salary sacrifice or the various Income Tax allowances and reliefs. There are [iloads[/i of legalised methods of tax avoidance. None of which are any different from a moral standpoint.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 2874 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: SBR "Wouldn't a limited company also have to pay VAT on the services it provides?
'"
Not if it's turnover is less than £77,000 per year. Companies do not have to be VAT registered below that figure.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Board Member | 1552 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2020 | Sep 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Most one man band limited companies like this register for vat under the governments flat rate scheme. You can then charge your ustomers 20 percent but only have to pay HMRC 14.5 percent or less.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Star | 3605 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jul 2012 | 12 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2016 | May 2016 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Again, the only word of warning I'll give to the OP is that you are now walking into the deep end of the swimming pool, you have to be VERY disciplined to run yourself as a Limited Company and when you throw in VAT as well then you are talking about a complete change in your perceptions of how you earn money and how you pay taxes.
If you've arrived at this point from being a PAYE employee for years to suddenly being self employed then stop and think about how you are going to organise the fact that the money that gets paid into your bank account every month is NOT all your money, some of it belongs to HMRC and they get rather shirty when you don't hand it over to them.
Been there, bought the t-shirt, had the t-shirt repossessed
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Owner | 2874 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2004 | 21 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Aug 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Quote: Karlos "This is the quandary i have to be honest. Would this mean I would be better paying myself 35k a year and then leaving the rest of my earnings in the business account or would i then be hammered for other taxes etc.
Sorry if these are obvious questions everyone but its the first time ive had to work like this.
Thanks for all you posts as well everyone!'"
Its a difficult question to answer because everyone's circumstances are different. For example, if you have a wife or partner that doesn't currently work then that is an obvious easy route to get money out of the business tax free. Your best bet is to go and see a good local accountant who will be able to advise you based on your own personal circumstances.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 142 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jun 2005 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2012 | Oct 2012 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
|
| Karlos,
The sensible thing is to get advice from an accountant. All will have dealt with this scenario before, all will be able be to advise based on the IR35 rules. It may cost you a few quid up front to get their advice, but they will probably re-assure you and remove a lot of the worry and confusion that you have.
You do not need to go the Limited Company route. As stated by others this does have advantages - you can pay a small salary with the usual PAYE & NI deductions, and then pay yourself a dividend. Dividends attract a flat 20% tax, and no National Insurance. And this is irrespective of whatever you total annual earnings are from all sources.
The main thing to be mindful off is if you go Limited, Self Employed, Unbrella, you will have to employ a bit of disciplined administration. This will not be a big burden if managed continually, and is not rocket science.
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 14395 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
May 2024 | May 2022 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
TO BE FIXED |
Moderator
|
| Quote: SBR "Yup. Just like paying into a pension by salary sacrifice or the various Income Tax allowances and reliefs. There are [iloads[/i of legalised methods of tax avoidance. None of which are any different from a moral standpoint.'"
They are completely different form a moral standpoint because its blindingly obvious what the differences are between the situations. The government expressly grants you tax relief on pension contributions as an incentive to save for a pension. They have not deliberately set things up for the self employed so they can avoid tax. That is no different than "doing a Jimmy Carr". It was obvious the money that was paid to the K2 company were his wages for his services. It is equally obvious a contractor's company is getting the contractors wages for his services. They should be therefore taxed as income tax not capital gains. The fact there are things like tax relief on pension contributions so this is the same is a ridiculous argument. We are dealing with income and income should be taxed as such.
If its OK for contractors to pay themselves via dividends to lower their tax then its OK for Jimmy Carr to do what he was doing. Clearly neither are morally acceptable or they both are.
|
|
|
|
|
|