I played the Allstars demo and thought it was ok to have a few games on that way but I wouldn't buy the full game.

Thing is the first Smackdown games had the genre covered in every way including storylines, every match type you can think of (Tables, Ladders and Chairs matches Multiplayer with mates was epic) and the whole roster was included too. Only things that can be improved these days for Wrestling games is an updated roster and the graphics!

Smackdown 2 on the PS2 was the best wrestling game of all time. Warzone had some really cool unlockable content which seemed exciting at the time and Attitude played a lot better. Wresting games are unplayable these days for me, they are just weird.

I remeber Warzone came out just as Wrestling was becoming "big" again but the roster was already out of date but it was a really good game. Attitude was a great game and they really improved it but it was too fiddly having to press stuff like left, left, down, square, square, triangle just to do a wrestling move! When THQ bought the rights (which I think they've had since, not sure) they made the Smackdown games some of the best around. Not bought a Wrestling game since the one with Brock Lesnar on the front. Think it was around 6-7 years ago that!

Very very underwhelmed by the ending of Mass Effect 3. Looks like your Paragon/Renegade route means absolutely nothing, along with the choices you make during the game.

There is a good element of story telling, the only thing is you are limited to 3 wrestlers per storyline. Why couldn't they make it like the previous games where you can pick a wrestler and have a full storyline?

So has anyone finished Mass Effect 3? Thoughts?

I'm about 20 hours in and have enjoyed it. There're a couple of annoying aspects to it like the journal and the fact that half the side quests you come accross can't be solved straight away so sometimes I'll find something that I need to complete a quest later in the game and can't remember who gave me the quest in the first place.

Shame about Game/Gamestation, less competition is always a bad thing.

Latest Assassins Creed 3 newshttps://www.computerandvideogames.com/341501/ubisoft-montreal-talks-assassins-creed-3-this-is-a-huge-investment-in-gameplay-and-scale/rl

It looks like the AC franchise could be about to fulfill its potential with this one.

99% of the game is amazing. Some really great story lines, wrapping some stuff up. Then the ending happens, and it is like been kicked in the gut. One of the worst endings ever. Rest of the game is great though.

Have a look at the video "Mass Effect 3 Indoctrination Theory" on the video sharing website. It explains quite a lot about the ME3 ending and some of it actually makes quite a bit of sense.

Quite buggy in places too, especially in one of the missions which made me not able to interact with one of my favourite characters from ME2.

Started ME3 yesterday... it seems decent enough. Do you know what i hate though, and perhaps it's slightly picky, weapon mods just conveniently placed around buildings for you to pick up. It's like being in a large food-processing factory and in the corner of a room there's a sniper rifle silencer. Why? What possible reason could there be for that? The reason you have in-game credits is to buy things.

It's always been part of ME that didn't make sense: You're a major hero out to save the universe. You have the best ship around. But you have to scrape around for credits to upgrade hand guns.

I'd agree to a point. I'd say it was more to do with EA being a bunch of greedy pr1cks just out to make as much money out of people as possible at the expense of quality.