FORUMS > The Sin Bin > Seems like 'we' might start shooting people? |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
|
Quote: Cronus " However, it seems the protest was mainly peaceful until a rumour spread that rlpolice had beaten a 16 year-old girlrl. It could therefore be argued that this rumour was in fact the cause of riots?
'"
But for the shooting their would not have been a protest and but for the protest their would not have been a 16 year old girl to push / attack at that time.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/0 ... iots-study
"They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots, and anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned – even outside London"
See it's their for you to see. 'Anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan triggered initial disturbances'
But for the police shooting Mark Duggan their would not have been a riot in Tottenham.
|
|
Quote: Cronus " However, it seems the protest was mainly peaceful until a rumour spread that rlpolice had beaten a 16 year-old girlrl. It could therefore be argued that this rumour was in fact the cause of riots?
'"
But for the shooting their would not have been a protest and but for the protest their would not have been a 16 year old girl to push / attack at that time.
www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/0 ... iots-study
"They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots, and anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned – even outside London"
See it's their for you to see. 'Anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan triggered initial disturbances'
But for the police shooting Mark Duggan their would not have been a riot in Tottenham.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
| Interesting article....
Alex rioted 'when the crowd explained why they were there' - to protest over Duggan.
But for the shooting their would have been no protest, no violence, no riot - In Tottenham.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
|
75% of rioters said the shooting of Duggan was an important or very important cause of the riots.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
| LSE-Guardian Study....
"They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots, [sizeand anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned[/size – even outside London"
Now let FA come on and try and argue otherwise....
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
//www.pngnrlbid.com
[quote="bUsTiNyAbALLs":9q9d2t35]Do not converse with me you filthy minded deviant.[/quote:9q9d2t35]
[quote="vastman":9q9d2t35]My rage isn't impotent luv, I'm frothing at the mouth actually.[/quote:9q9d2t35]: |
|
| Quote: McLaren_Field "There's a bit of a confused logic there though isn't there ?
You believe that the consequences of the police shooting a man are civil riot and yet would support the police shooting more people who are rioting, presumably leading to more people rioting because of those shootings ?'"
No, i agree with you, the police responding more aggressively would have only inflamed the situation.
However if the police had needed to respond more aggressively in a specific situation to save lives then they of course, without question, would have needed to do so, but only in that very specific situation.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 22777 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
May 2006 | 18 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jun 2020 | Feb 2018 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
//www.pngnrlbid.com
[quote="bUsTiNyAbALLs":9q9d2t35]Do not converse with me you filthy minded deviant.[/quote:9q9d2t35]
[quote="vastman":9q9d2t35]My rage isn't impotent luv, I'm frothing at the mouth actually.[/quote:9q9d2t35]: |
|
| Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "That would be you - as you reply to this will, I predict, perfectly illustrate.
Responses to your drivel don't have to be boring. I can entertain, as well as demolishing you ever decreasing circular non-points. If you don’t like it, then try sensible posts.'" Are you going to try and do this then or just stick with what surely must be a willful misunderstanding and failed attempts at humer?
Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "You see, it’s just this goldfish-like retention of your own rambling that makes you seem stupid. Your words wereSomeone doesnt seem to understand what the word IF means. i.e IF they didnt think they couldnt use lethal force it was because they were mistaken, because they could use whatever force was necessary to save lives. Of course IF they knew they could use lethal force but chose not to because the situation didnt warrant it then that is a different matter. However neither of these IF scenarios affect the fact they could use it.
Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "Having already demolished the wider point, I don’t need to do the same to this more restricted “individual police officer” point. However, I’d be interested to know what the difference in this individual’s case actually is, between “being unaware he could use lethal force” (which you say you haven’t suggested) and “didn’t know he could use lethal force”, which were, er, again YOUR words. Oops.'" It seems because of your lack of understand of the word IF, and the reason it was used, it has sent you on a strange wild goose chase.
Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "I consider the view that holding the police “responsible” for the riots, and/or claiming that the riots were a “consequence” of that incident, is arrant nonsense. I would bet a lot of money that 99% of the rioters couldn’t even tell you the deceased’s name, and that incident will have played not the slightest part whatsoever in the riots in other cities.
Obviously the initial spark of rioting in Tottenham followed the shooting, but even there I have seen no suggestion that anyone rioted [ibecause of that incident[/i or as some sort of protest at the death of that individual. Of course, there is a massive anti-police feeling in much of UK subculture, and I equally have no doubt that the opportunity to use this as an excuse to have a crack at the police was a major factor.
Do you understand the distinction? Anti-police rioting, of people claiming to be oppressed by the police, as opposed to people who had no issues with the police, but suddenly decided to go on the rampage just because this individual was shot?
The LSE/Guardian analysis of explanations from a large number of convicted rioters themselves. Of those interviewedI think AJW has conclusively proved what 'arrant nonsense' you have put here.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
12389.gif :12389.gif |
|
| Quote: Ajw71 "But for the shooting their would not have been a protest and but for the protest their would not have been a 16 year old girl to push / attack at that time.'"
Causation is not the same as linked events. This is the part you don't seem to understand.
Of course the protest was because of the shooting, but a copper did not hit a girl with a shield because of the shooting. Of course, she was there because of the shooting, but he hit her because she threw a stone. He didn't think "we shot Mark Duggan earlier, therefore I'll belt this girl", he thought "she's throwing stuff at me, therefore I'll give her a shove".
Quote: Ajw71 "www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2011/dec/05/anger-police-fuelled-riots-study
"They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots, and anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned – even outside London"
See it's their for you to see. 'Anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan triggered initial disturbances'
But for the police shooting Mark Duggan their would not have been a riot in Tottenham.'"
Erm, yes, that's exactly what I said. No-one is saying the initial trouble in Tottenham wasn't linked to the shooting, or indeed that anger and confusion over the shooting wasn't the trigger that caused crowds to gather and some disturbances, but it certainly wasn't the cause of the wider lootings and riots. The initial protest march in Tottenham was, of course, caused by reaction to the shooting. Actual violence, it seems, started as a result of a rumour of police assault on a teenage girl. Further violence spread as people perceived a loss of control by the police.
I can also find statements in articles (the same article we've both quoted, in fact), as well as "Others present said the spark for the rioting was a specific incident involving a 16-year-old woman, who stepped forward to confront police around 8.30pm."
Those people of course were there because of the shooting. But it did not turn violent BECAUSE of the shooting. It turned violent. it seems, because of the rumour of an assault.
Let's look at some actual reports into the disturbances, not a survey commissioned by a newspaper, and you'll find many reasons for the trouble - primarily opportunism based on a weak police reactionHome Officerl
"Even in Tottenham, it is not clear that the circumstances surrounding the death of Mark Duggan were the only influences at play. In other locations, the link to the original trigger is even more tenuous and provides no explanation for what went on."
"There is also anecdotal evidence that some people became involved in the disorder because they saw the police standing by and not arresting anyone, or because there were no police present at all. This was the view of the young people we spoke to at Feltham Young Offenders Institution"
rlUK Riots Executive Summaryrl (an independent body)
"The vast majority of people we spoke to believed that the sole trigger for disturbances in their areas was the perception that the police could not contain the scale of rioting in Tottenham and then across London."
"Rioters believed they would be able to loot and damage without being challenged by the police. In the hardest hit areas, they were correct"
"Lack of confidence in the police response to the initial riots encouraged people to test reactions in other areas."
"It seems clear that the spread of rioting was helped both by televised images of police watching people cause damage and looting at will"
And don't edit articles to suit your agenda. What the article actually says isAlthough rioters expressed a mix of opinions about the disorder, many of those involved said they felt like they were participating in explicitly anti-police riots. They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots, and anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned – even outside London.'"
So, "policing" was in fact the most significant cause.
I'll say it again. Causation is not the same as a series of linked events. Yes, initially, a small number were in situ because of the shooting. The subsequent violence did not start because of the shooting, but because of events that occurred while crowds were gathered in relation to the shooting. The wider trouble across London and England was barely even linked to the shooting.
|
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
International Chairman | 26578 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Mar 2002 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | Apr 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
1408_1377158863.jpg [url=http://tinyurl.com/xmaschoccy:3awnsnxa][img:3awnsnxa]http://imgur.com/dR3Vl.gif[/img:3awnsnxa][/url:3awnsnxa]
[b:3awnsnxa][url=http://rover.ebay.com/rover/1/710-53481-19255-0/1?type=3&campid=5335822080&toolid=10001&customid=sitcforum&ext=rugby+league&satitle=rugby+league:3awnsnxa]ebay's Rugby League Bargains[/url:3awnsnxa][/b:3awnsnxa] ¦ [b:3awnsnxa][url=http://pepperkorn.shauctions.hop.clickbank.net/?tid=CAP1:3awnsnxa]Boost Your eBay Sales[/url:3awnsnxa][/b:3awnsnxa] ¦ [b:3awnsnxa][url=http://www.amazon.co.uk/gp/search?ie=UTF8&keywords=%26%2334%3Brugby%20league%26%2334%3B&tag=newrugbyleaguestore-21&index=blended&linkCode=ur2&camp=1634&creative=6738:3awnsnxa]Recommended Amazon Stuff[/url:3awnsnxa][/b:3awnsnxa] ¦ [b:3awnsnxa][url=http://www.jdoqocy.com/click-2143305-10444737:3awnsnxa]Get a Free Ink Cart!!![/url:3awnsnxa][/b:3awnsnxa] ¦ [b:3awnsnxa][url=http://tinyurl.com/yettlvv:3awnsnxa]Quins RL T-Shirts, BRAND NEW DESIGNS[/url:3awnsnxa][/b:3awnsnxa]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_1408.jpg |
|
| Exit polls for rioters
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 18610 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22214_1285226877.jpg War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Thank God I'm an atheist.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22214.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ajw71 "LSE-Guardian Study....
"They cited "policing" as the most significant cause of the riots,[sizeand anger over the police shooting of Mark Duggan, which triggered initial disturbances in Tottenham, was repeatedly mentioned[/size – even outside London"
Now let FA come on and try and argue otherwise....
He's preparing his case even as we type.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
| Quote: Cronus "Causation is not the same as linked events. This is the part you don't seem to understand.
Of course the protest was because of the shooting, but a copper did not hit a girl with a shield because of the shooting. Of course, she was there because of the shooting, but he hit her because she threw a stone. He didn't think "we shot Mark Duggan earlier, therefore I'll belt this girl", he thought "she's throwing stuff at me, therefore I'll give her a shove".
Erm, yes, that's exactly what I said. No-one is saying the initial trouble in Tottenham wasn't linked to the shooting, or indeed that anger and confusion over the shooting wasn't the trigger that caused crowds to gather and some disturbances, but it certainly wasn't the cause of the wider lootings and riots. The initial protest march in Tottenham was, of course, caused by reaction to the shooting. Actual violence, it seems, started as a result of a rumour of police assault on a teenage girl. Further violence spread as people perceived a loss of control by the police.
I can also find statements in articles (the same article we've both quoted, in fact), as well as "Others present said the spark for the rioting was a specific incident involving a 16-year-old woman, who stepped forward to confront police around 8.30pm."
Those people of course were there because of the shooting. But it did not turn violent BECAUSE of the shooting. It turned violent. it seems, because of the rumour of an assault.
Let's look at some actual reports into the disturbances, not a survey commissioned by a newspaper, and you'll find many reasons for the trouble - primarily opportunism based on a weak police reactionHome Officerl
"Even in Tottenham, it is not clear that the circumstances surrounding the death of Mark Duggan were the only influences at play. In other locations, the link to the original trigger is even more tenuous and provides no explanation for what went on."
"There is also anecdotal evidence that some people became involved in the disorder because they saw the police standing by and not arresting anyone, or because there were no police present at all. This was the view of the young people we spoke to at Feltham Young Offenders Institution"
rlUK Riots Executive Summaryrl (an independent body)
"The vast majority of people we spoke to believed that the sole trigger for disturbances in their areas was the perception that the police could not contain the scale of rioting in Tottenham and then across London."
"Rioters believed they would be able to loot and damage without being challenged by the police. In the hardest hit areas, they were correct"
"Lack of confidence in the police response to the initial riots encouraged people to test reactions in other areas."
"It seems clear that the spread of rioting was helped both by televised images of police watching people cause damage and looting at will"
And don't edit articles to suit your agenda. What the article actually says is
So you agree then that if Duggan hadn't of been shot their wouldn't have been a riot?
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
| Quote: Stand-Offish "He's preparing his case even as we type.'"
Let him...
He tells porkies.
Quote: Stand-Offish "
The LSE/Guardian analysis of explanations from a large number of convicted rioters themselves. Of those interviewed
Wonder if Cronus will have a word for 'twisting articles to suit agendas'. I guess it's probably ok when it's their 'side' doing the twisting.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 18610 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Aug 2024 | Jul 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22214_1285226877.jpg War does not determine who is right - only who is left.
Thank God I'm an atheist.:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22214.jpg |
|
| Quote: Ajw71 "Let him...
He tells porkies.
Wonder if Cronus will have a word for 'twisting articles to suit agendas'. I guess it's probably ok when it's their 'side' doing the twisting.'"
If you look at your bargraph, you will see that the SAME people gave a variety of things that they thought were a cause (a factor might be a better word).
It's a fair old list as well.
it's clear that the Duggan thing wasn't THE cause (as in singular).
It was a factor.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Coach | 7152 | |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Jan 2005 | 20 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2020 | Jun 2020 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
12389.gif :12389.gif |
|
| Quote: Ajw71 "So you agree then that if Duggan hadn't of been shot their wouldn't have been a riot?'"
There wouldn't have been a protest march.
It was a contributory factor to the initial subsequent trouble, but had little directly to do with the looting even in Tottenham later that night. It had very little to do with the violence that spread throughout London and even less nationwide.
And if it hadn't been the Duggan shooting, another incident would have been the trigger. Note - the trigger, not the cause.
|
|
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Player Coach | 1978 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Feb 2006 | 19 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Dec 2023 | Dec 2019 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
22483_1351031655.jpg :d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_22483.jpg |
|
| Quote: Cronus "
And if it hadn't been the Duggan shooting, another incident would have been the trigger. Note - the trigger, not the cause.'"
There was no other incident, it was a shooting.
The Duggan shooting 'triggered' (set off; initiated) the rioting.
So but for the shooting there wouldn't have been a riot.
(I'm just talking about Tottenham here. Not other parts of the UK)
|
|
|
|
|
|