FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!
  
FORUMS > The Sin Bin > Historical sexual abuse charges...
320 posts in 22 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201212 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2016May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
67953_1341943970.jpg
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://garykitchen.co.uk/:lnkxkae0]Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork[/url:lnkxkae0] ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://jerrychicken.wordpress.com/:lnkxkae0]JerryChicken - The Blog[/url:lnkxkae0] ----------------------------------------------------------:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67953.jpg



Quote: Standee "no, he cant be convicted Lord God AHole said so!

5years and 9 months is 20 years too few for me, he stole the childhoods and innocence of so many, the fact he'll be out in 2 and a half years disgusts me, I am sure he'll have some new frineds inside.

Amazing isn't it, defraud the VAT/HMRC officers and you get 8 years plus, touch up children and you get a few years...!'"


No you don't, not if you do it now - if you read the judges comments then that is highlighted very well.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner37503
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2015Oct 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: JerryChicken "No you don't, not if you do it now - if you read the judges comments then that is highlighted very well.'"

have missed that part, care to expand?

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner17898
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Mar 2020Aug 2019LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
7384_1394882426.png
[url=http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/0/rugby-league/14252202:io879g1y]2005 Challenge Cup[/url:io879g1y] To reconcile respect with practicality, what is the optimum speed for a hearse?:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_7384.png



It's got to be based on the law and sentences as they were at the time though.

Yes it's probably not enough, but he's 84, ill according to the judge's remarks (and his records and a report will be sent to the Prison Service, suggesting it isn't a minor thing) so I'd guess he's unlikely to see the light of day again.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner37503
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2015Oct 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: Chris28 "It's got to be based on the law and sentences as they were at the time though.

Yes it's probably not enough, but he's 84, ill according to the judge's remarks (and his records and a report will be sent to the Prison Service, suggesting it isn't a minor thing) so I'd guess he's unlikely to see the light of day again.'"

does that make any difference, the fact he might die in jail just means he's going to be more expensive to keep, he should have to pay for his day to day care and needs, sorry, but child molestation is the absolute lowest. I can almost forgive murder as a crime of passion, but touching up kids, there can be no reasonable mitigation.

RankPostsTeam
International Star4647
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Jun 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
50733_1530270912.jpg
[color=#000000:ogl9gbum]"Back home we got a taxidermy man. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him."[/color:ogl9gbum]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50733.jpg



Quote: Standee "have missed that part, care to expand?'"


He was sentenced based on when the offences took place. Had they have happened more recently he may well have been looking at a much larger sentence.

RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201212 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2016May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
67953_1341943970.jpg
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://garykitchen.co.uk/:lnkxkae0]Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork[/url:lnkxkae0] ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://jerrychicken.wordpress.com/:lnkxkae0]JerryChicken - The Blog[/url:lnkxkae0] ----------------------------------------------------------:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67953.jpg



It should also be noted that sentencing guidelines are just that - guidelines for the judges to decide upon the length of the sentence, the sentencing guidelines for magistrates for example is available to browse on the web, search for "the bench book" and you'll find that it contains dozens upon dozens of pages of guidelines for sentencing all sorts of offences with all sorts of variations depending on the circumstances of each individual case, its not as simple as "He carried a knife therefore its five years" despite what the tabloids would like everyone to believe.

I would imagine that the guidelines for High Court judges would be similar and reading the judgement its obvious that he took into account quite a bit of mitigation and that he was a little frustrated that he couldn't apply today's tariffs.

All in all I think its a reasonable result.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner37503
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 200321 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2015Oct 2014LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature

:



Quote: JerryChicken "All in all I think its a reasonable result.'"


So, if it was one of yours, you'd feel the same?

RankPostsTeam
International Star4647
JoinedServiceReputation
Mar 201014 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Sep 2024Jun 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
50733_1530270912.jpg
[color=#000000:ogl9gbum]"Back home we got a taxidermy man. He gonna have a heart attack when he see what I brung him."[/color:ogl9gbum]:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_50733.jpg



Whether it's 5 years or 25 years, his life outside of prison will be a sentence in itself. If he lives to see the day he is due for release that is. No one will want to be associated with him, his reputation is now in tatters.

A friend of mine who owns an art gallery only commented the other day that a woman had been in to buy a painting to replace an original Rolf Harris painting she'd taken down in light of the trial. We were looking at Rolf Harris artworks for sale on ebay today and one seller has added to his listing of 3 prints - *** REDUCED IN PRICE - THESE NEED TO GO ***

RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201212 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2016May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
67953_1341943970.jpg
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://garykitchen.co.uk/:lnkxkae0]Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork[/url:lnkxkae0] ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://jerrychicken.wordpress.com/:lnkxkae0]JerryChicken - The Blog[/url:lnkxkae0] ----------------------------------------------------------:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67953.jpg



Quote: Standee "So, if it was one of yours, you'd feel the same?'"


Nope, but thats not how the law works, victims statements are a small part of sentencing and can be taken into account but will still not affect the overwhelming reason why historical sex abuse trials result in what some perceive to be small sentences - the fact that they are sentenced according to guidelines prevailing at the time of the offences is the overwhelming reason.

In the case of Rolf Harris I must admit to being slightly in agreement with LGJM in that one of the victims has claimed in her statement that the whole of her life has been ruined by what Harris did to her, her alcoholism and the fact that she has never held down a job in her life so far is all blamed on what Harris did to her - and yet she allowed the abuse to continue for several years and on several occasions and on into an age when she certainly could act for herself as an adult - for me that doesn't seem to add up and your mantra of "personal responsibility" could easily be applied here.

RankPostsTeam
Moderator14395No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2024May 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
26.jpg
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20 Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18:26.jpg

Moderator


Quote: JerryChicken "

In the case of Rolf Harris I must admit to being slightly in agreement with LGJM in that one of the victims has claimed in her statement that the whole of her life has been ruined by what Harris did to her, her alcoholism and the fact that she has never held down a job in her life so far is all blamed on what Harris did to her - and yet she allowed the abuse to continue for several years and on several occasions and on into an age when she certainly could act for herself as an adult - for me that doesn't seem to add up and your mantra of "personal responsibility" could easily be applied here.'"


I agree and the victim statement from the one who was 7 or 8 at the time is hard to believe as it apparently at took away here childhood, left her an angry child and unable to trust men. Maybe it did, maybe it didn't but how you can connect the two is hard to see. She was at most 8 years old, what happened was a one off (and yes highly improper and disgusting) grope but I can't help thinking if you are asked to say how it affected you then you will think of something to say.

The judge has treated the statement as the gospel truth though which I also find disturbing as a general principle. Because the accused has been fond guilty the victim's impact statement is taken as read without challenge.

RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201212 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2016May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
67953_1341943970.jpg
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://garykitchen.co.uk/:lnkxkae0]Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork[/url:lnkxkae0] ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://jerrychicken.wordpress.com/:lnkxkae0]JerryChicken - The Blog[/url:lnkxkae0] ----------------------------------------------------------:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67953.jpg



Quote: King Street Cat "Whether it's 5 years or 25 years, his life outside of prison will be a sentence in itself. If he lives to see the day he is due for release that is. No one will want to be associated with him, his reputation is now in tatters.

A friend of mine who owns an art gallery only commented the other day that a woman had been in to buy a painting to replace an original Rolf Harris painting she'd taken down in light of the trial. We were looking at Rolf Harris artworks for sale on ebay today and one seller has added to his listing of 3 prints - *** REDUCED IN PRICE - THESE NEED TO GO ***'"


As someone with a slight interest in art I find that attitude rather strange, possibly not with his prints which are all part of the general "flavour of the month" faddy art market, (the fact that you can buy them on ebay tells you that) but his original artwork is still high quality artwork, despite what you think about him he is still a fine artist and his original work does not alter for the fact that he is a sex offender, nor (in my opinion) will that devalue it in the long term, it may even make it more valuable especially the fact that there won't be much new work for a while.

The bohemian nature of artists in the past should make us question their sexual predatory nature and should in theory devalue their works but it doesn't, did any question Picasso when he, in today terminology "groomed" a teenage girl when he was in his sixties and then married her when she was 21, did anyone ever question Gauguin when he fled France and exiled himself in Tahiti and made a career of painting young naked Tahitian girls - well maybe they did at the time but we see them, and many others, as great artists now...

RankPostsTeam
Moderator14395No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Dec 200123 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2024May 2022LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
26.jpg
Last league derby at Central Park 5/9/1999: Wigan 28 St. Helens 20 Last league derby at Knowsley Road 2/4/2010: St. Helens 10 Wigan 18:26.jpg

Moderator


Quote: Derwent "Ok so that's one of the twelve charges you've dealt with and a fairly minor one at that. '"


The problem with the offences that were supposed to take place in 1975/76 when he only went there in 1978 is that the fact he went there in 1978 was used as evidence he was liar.

He said he had no recollection of ever having been to Cambridge before 2000. Then it comes out he went in 1978 so despite the fact he wasn't there or on the show the victim said the assault occurred on in 1975/76 he is now branded a liar.

Now you might say it was unreasonable to expect the victim to pinpoint the date or even mention the correct show this assault occurred on but then it's surely unreasonable to effectively go fishing for a date when he was in this location and imply that must be when it happened. Likewise the fact he said he'd never been there before 2000 is not an unreasonable thing to suggest but suppose he [ihad[/i recalled being there in 1978? That would have been a straightforward and verifiable contradiction of the evidence before the jury but because he said 2000 it works against him.

Even if this particular case had been found not-guilty (which it wasn't) it would still have been being used as a mechanism to paint Harris as a liar trying to talk his way out of his crimes.

RankPostsTeam
Club Owner2874No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Feb 200421 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Aug 2024Aug 2024LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
8762_1295775855.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_8762.jpg



In the sentencing hearing this morning the prosecuting counsel told the court that police had found a substantial amount of child porn on Harris' computer after he was arrested. Those offences have been allowed to lie on file. It's clear that he had an unhealthy interest in children and I'd be surprised if there weren't many other victims over the years.

RankPostsTeam
International Star3605No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jul 201212 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
May 2016May 2016LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
67953_1341943970.jpg
Someday everything is gonna be different, when I paint my masterpiece ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://garykitchen.co.uk/:lnkxkae0]Online art gallery, selling original landscape artwork[/url:lnkxkae0] ---------------------------------------------------------- [url=http://jerrychicken.wordpress.com/:lnkxkae0]JerryChicken - The Blog[/url:lnkxkae0] ----------------------------------------------------------:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_67953.jpg



www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... ldren.html

33 images is enough but not what most would call "substantial", nor was it ever provable that the "teenage" girls in the images were underage as you can read in the article above - this is a major problem with crimes like this and also with the reporting of such crimes.

Its quite easy for a crappy tabloid, lets say The Mail for instance, with a record of featuring under 18 year olds on their web site sidebar of shame clad in very few clothes and calling them "leggy" or admiring the way they are developing, its quite easy for such a publication to state "substantial" without ever having to explain that none of the images may actually have been illegal or that nothing of the sort has actually been proven in a court of law.


What is VERY interesting about this case is that Harris was one of the first "names" to have been arrested right back at the start of Yewtree but his lawyers successfully pressurised the media into not naming him for over twelve months until one of them finally broke ranks, in the meantime several other "names" who were interviewed were all named instantly in the media - why them and not him ?

Having an interest in his art I saw allegations printed on a forum on his web site right at the start which were quickly removed and the forum shut down and at one point a statement mentioned that police enquiries were rigorously denied and no further comment would be made - his web site and the selling part of his web site has now been removed.

You may wonder if the evidence against him at that point was not enough to write a tabloid headline over or whether the threat of a several times millionaire taking them to a libel court may have persuaded them otherwise, but why not Freddie Starr (for instance) who's "evidence" was even more flimsy, too flimsy to even bother with a court case and yet he was still named immediately ?

Is this the reason why jimmy Savile got away with it for so long ?
www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/ ... ldren.html

33 images is enough but not what most would call "substantial", nor was it ever provable that the "teenage" girls in the images were underage as you can read in the article above - this is a major problem with crimes like this and also with the reporting of such crimes.

Its quite easy for a crappy tabloid, lets say The Mail for instance, with a record of featuring under 18 year olds on their web site sidebar of shame clad in very few clothes and calling them "leggy" or admiring the way they are developing, its quite easy for such a publication to state "substantial" without ever having to explain that none of the images may actually have been illegal or that nothing of the sort has actually been proven in a court of law.


What is VERY interesting about this case is that Harris was one of the first "names" to have been arrested right back at the start of Yewtree but his lawyers successfully pressurised the media into not naming him for over twelve months until one of them finally broke ranks, in the meantime several other "names" who were interviewed were all named instantly in the media - why them and not him ?

Having an interest in his art I saw allegations printed on a forum on his web site right at the start which were quickly removed and the forum shut down and at one point a statement mentioned that police enquiries were rigorously denied and no further comment would be made - his web site and the selling part of his web site has now been removed.

You may wonder if the evidence against him at that point was not enough to write a tabloid headline over or whether the threat of a several times millionaire taking them to a libel court may have persuaded them otherwise, but why not Freddie Starr (for instance) who's "evidence" was even more flimsy, too flimsy to even bother with a court case and yet he was still named immediately ?

Is this the reason why jimmy Savile got away with it for so long ?


RankPostsTeam
Player Coach4697No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 200916 years
OnlineLast PostLast Page
Apr 2015Apr 2015LINK
Milestone Posts
0
100
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Signature
41913_1351384834.jpg
:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_41913.jpg



Quote: Standee "no, he cant be convicted Lord God AHole said so!

5years and 9 months is 20 years too few for me, he stole the childhoods and innocence of so many, the fact he'll be out in 2 and a half years disgusts me, I am sure he'll have some new frineds inside.

Amazing isn't it, defraud the VAT/HMRC officers and you get 8 years plus, touch up children and you get a few years...!'"


I haven't read any of the subsequent replies. I clicked on the link for the judges summation and it was NA. But I will just quickly respond to you.

I've explained at very long length my reasons for feeling uneasy at him being sent to prison. I've implored someone to point me to examples of why his jail sentence is justified. No one has offered anything as to why he deserves to be labelled a paedo and his life in extreme danger unless he is massively protected in prison.

But everyone pretty much seems to support him going to jail for a long lime and will probably cheer if he doesn't last a week inside before being killed.

IMO the only reason for this is that he's been labelled as a paedophile. Apart from the 8 year old girl, the label isn't even appropriate. But because he's labelled as a paedo people seem to instinctively want him dead.

If Harris did touch the 8 year old girl inappropriately then TBH I join in with everyone else in hoping he's killed. If he did that then let him swing. But if you're happy with a he said, she said 40 years after the event that's your right. It leaves me with a profound sense of unease.

I've hinted in my posts, perhaps badly, about times in my life when people were in the grips of a media frenzy. The nonsense fabrication of satanic ritual abuse, the issue of repressed and fabricated memories, Roseanne Barr and her allegation that nearly everyone's been abused, we just don't remember it. Most of these frenzies turn out to be nonsense. IMO with the death of Savile and post death feeding frenzy we've gone from one extreme to the other.

320 posts in 22 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>
320 posts in 22 pages 
<<   PREV  NEXT   >>



All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.

Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.

RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.

Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM

You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.



Please Support RLFANS.COM


5.19775390625:5
RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
28m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
40091
30m
Film game
Boss Hog
3732
34m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
62451
53m
Rumours and signings v9
CobraCraig
28748
Recent
bulls on Sunday
Bully_Boxer
15
Recent
Bulls Accounts up to Nov 2023
Bully_Boxer
15
Recent
TV Games - Not Hull
Jake the Peg
2734
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
8s
This weeks disciplinary
MorePlaymake
1339
20s
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Sir Gregory
9900
26s
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
62451
27s
Planning for next season
Jack Gaskell
101
28s
Tom Johnstone
Trojan Horse
15
28s
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
NickyKiss
2871
30s
DoR - New Coach - Investor & Adam - New signings
RockNRolla
3130
41s
Rumours and signings v9
CobraCraig
28748
57s
Round 27 HKR Away
Seth
7
1m
Squad for London
karetaker
30
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Wigan Seal League Leaders Trophy By Thrashing Salford
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
Barrow
FOREVERTRIN
6
TODAY
Holly Spurr Interview
JamieRobinso
1
TODAY
Wolves again
Deadcowboys1
2
TODAY
Academy Players Promoted to First Team Squad
Simba16
2
TODAY
Squads - Leopards v Saints
Deeeekos
2
TODAY
Round 27 HKR Away
Seth
7
TODAY
Squad for London
karetaker
30
TODAY
Hull FC preview
Jimmythecuck
1
TODAY
Halifax A
Wigan Bull
4
TODAY
East stand
PopTart
12
TODAY
Locations of League
Wollo-Wollo-
1
TODAY
Matt Parcell to leave at seasons end
Huddersfield
1
TODAY
Huddersfiels to get new stadium
RobRiches
2
TODAY
IMG
Crosswire
4
TODAY
Leaving players
Murphy
1
TODAY
bulls on Sunday
Bully_Boxer
15
TODAY
Concerts at Stadiums
Fantastic Mr
11
TODAY
Finn out Murrell in
faxcar
11
TODAY
Playoff Semi Final
MattyB
3
TODAY
Bulls Accounts up to Nov 2023
Bully_Boxer
15
TODAY
Shareholders Meeting
Scarlet Pimp
36
TODAY
James Clark
Jake the Peg
6
TODAY
Le Cats at home - Los Alomos Custers Last Stand
Jake the Peg
46
TODAY
Realistic targets for 2025
the cal trai
31
TODAY
2024 Southstandercom Prediction Competition Week 27
ducknumber1
33
TODAY
Club Statement
UllFC
49
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Wigan Seal League Leaders Trop..
169
Wakefield Trinity Sweep Aside ..
823
Catalans Keep Season Alive Wit..
598
Salford Ensure Play-Offs And S..
627
Ruthless Wigan Thrash the Rhin..
748
Huddersfield Giants Hold Off L..
1061
Salford Close In On The Play O..
996
Leigh Leopards Up To Fourth Af..
1114
Leeds Rhinos Into the Six Afte..
1082
Wigan Warriors Defeat Hull KR ..
1112
Wane Names Provisional Squad f..
1489
Leeds Rhinos Ride Their Luck F..
1444
Wigan Warriors Level Top As Ca..
1571
Castleford Tigers Inflict Anot..
1502
Leigh Into the Six After Beati..
1688