I have put this piece of utter human garbage on my ignore list, as I refuse to waste a second more of my life in reading the self-righteous, sexist, judgmental, offensive drivel that this fundamentalist zealot moron glibly spouts. There would be more point in trying to debate with a pile of steaming dog, as whilst there would be an equal chance of obtaining a sensible response, it would be a lot less unpleasant.

A "heaven" containing offensive scumbags like him, and his version of "god" is about as near to a definition of "hell" as I can think of.

But she is still orders of magnitude smarter than you, probably a lot less offensive too.

He doesn't respond to anything that he can't understand, or anything that doesn't fit with his twisted, extremist views!

It never ceases to amaze me that when debating with people who hold a certain faith or religion normally reasonable and intelligent people who do not share that faith display such anger and bile.

I have to say I disagree entirely with Kirkstaller but like to think I could articulate my responses better than descending to calling him "human garbage" or such like.

Normally reasoned intelligent posters have let themselves down badly on this thread.

I have not judged anyone.

He started it by insisting that I (and of course you) are definitely doomed to rot in hell. And he knows. (Well, he's personally met jesus, so he should). Given what he believes hell to be, what has anyone said which is more bilious a slur than that?

I would suspect that the vast majority of people I know are religious, whether that be Christian, Muslim or whatever, yet I find them to be nice people. The reaction to kirkstaller is pretty unique and IMHO understandable, given the nasty stuff he comes out with. But each to his own.

[url=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Westboro_Baptist_ChurchWestboro?[/url

I can only speak for myself here, but I have no qualms whatsoever about calling someone a sanctimonious, heartless little sh[ii[/it when they appear to revel in the 'natural' death of a poor sod who spent the last 7 years trapped in a horrific situation which none of us can even contemplate - a situation the little sh[ii[/it in question would have happily seen extended indefinitely. No qualms at all. This isn't 'faith' we're talking about, it's bat mental, vindictive bigotry.

He can think what he likes about me. He might be right about where I am headed



I just gauge a very aggressive response whenever someone openly displays their faith from those who don't share those views.

No, mine is a an Evangelical church. We are not Hyper-Calvinists like the WBC.

To the layman this means that I am genuinely interested in spreading the Gospel and persuading people to choose Jesus.

WBC on the other hand believe that they belong to tiny handful of people who will be saved and that everyone else is doomed to Hell whether they like it or not. They don’t spread the Gospel; instead they revel, gloat and abuse those who they consider not worthy of God.

They are vile.



I did not revel in the natural death of Tony Nicklinson. I simply stated that it was a more dignified way to go out than persuading a doctor to murder him. I might not have expressed it as sensitively as I would have liked, but I make no apologies for the point I was making.

You mean people with a strong faith like Hitler, Stalin, Pol Pot, Ayatollah Khomeini, the Thugees, Kirkstaller???

Think extremist everywhere seek an aggressive response.

I think it's the shoving of views down others throats, the claim to indisputably be right, and the sheer arrogance of the man that winds people up, I'd be perfectly happy to debate any religion issue in a civilised manner like any other topic, but you can't with a man who claims to have personally met JC, and who insists that (apart from him, natch) we will all burn in hell, newborn babies are sinners deserving of punishment by disease and death, women are unfit to teach men, etc.