Why stop at 2, why not 3 or more-where does it stop?

Wow.

Surely the MPs are entitled to their views? Also, in some cases they may be representing the views of the majority of their consituents. Perish the thoughts.

When it comes to the magic man in the sky believers the only reason I've ever seen for them being against homosexuality is that they don't produce sprogs, and if they don't produce sprogs that's less people to indoctrinate.

I like your rose-tinted idea that these MPs have gone around their constituency with a questionnaire asking whether their constituents are opposed to or in favour of various things.

They'll do what MPs always do, extend their own prejudices into the voting lobbies.

Anyone is entitled to hold an abhorrent view. It doesn't stop it being abhorrent though.

What's wrong with not liking so called "gay" marriage? What's so evil about that?

Nothing really. Everyone is entitled to their prejudices. What's wrong is trying to introduce legislation to prevent other people engaging in an activity that causes no harm to them or to any of the participants, solely because it offends those prejudices.

Nigel Evans. Look him up, thats all I need to say.

Wanting to restrict the rights and freedoms of others based solely on your own bigoted views of what they should and shouldn't be getting up to? No, can't see a problem there.

Well, other than making an actual point ...

I cannot believe what I am reading, you all seem to think that the disgusting practices that these people get up to should be condoned and not only that but should be allowed to sully the sanctity of marriage. Marriage is ordained for a man and a woman not for a man and a man or a woman and a woman. I was not in favour of "gay" partnerships being legalised never mind marriage. Where will all this end? You'll all be sorry when your children are converted to homosexuality.