In Dallys (daily mail influenced) world, it's all the fault of immigrants that's we no longer refer to people formally or that GB rugby league hasn't won a World Cup

Regards

King James

We don't with the RLWC because of inbreeding in small Northern towns,

I would gamble that the Northern communities were far more close knit back in the day (when we last won the RLWC) and it's the influence of "outsiders" in the gene pool that has diluted some of the Northern grit.
On this basis, Brexit, with all its "controls", might actually help, keeping Jonny foreigner out and sticking to a rigid diet of mucky fat and fish and chips.

"We don't with the World Cup"

What does that mean?

Regards

King James

Seems the judges are ruling the country now. Telling Parliament what the law is and how it must apply it.Worrying times

Yep, Enemies of the State deciding British law - shocking.

Perhaps they could appeal to the European Court of Human Rights.

Don't Parliament tell legal what laws we require? Who do the courts think they are to instruct Parliament what to do.

I hope you are being sarcastic? Parliament make the laws and the courts make sure they are enacted. That is all that has gone on here. People wanted our democracy back. Well this is it.

Pound has fallen since the judges opined.

The key word there is PARLIAMENT. Parliament pass laws and the courts uphold them.

The court is saying that the GOVERNMENT (May & her ministers) can't do it alone and must let Parliament have their say on Brexit, similar to the process for passing laws. It's got nothing to do with the courts telling Parliament what to do.

I fully agree with the ruling too. There's no change to what's ultimately going to happen, which is the UK leaving the EU, but surely going through Parliament is the more democratic way to do it?

Whilst I might agree that Parliament is the appropriate democratic tool, what happens if a pro remain Parliament filibusters the life out of the democratic process so that we end up with nothing, or a Brexit Lite solution overturning the sprit of Brexit that was contained within the referendum?

I understand that arguments will be and have been had regarding the 'great unwashed' not knowing what was on the table and what is good for them but I just don't buy it sounds like a stitch to me. After all if they say that we didn't have the information to make an informed choice who's fault is that?

What the eff is that?

Yep, it's fallen by 0.05% as I type, as opposed to it dropping by 10% straight after the Brexit vote.

Parliament as I understand it is there to represent the electorate? The referendum represented Parliament delegating the decision up to the electorate. The electorate voted out and so Parliament has no reason to debate the issue in my view. That said, if they try to overturn it there will no doubt be serious civil unrest and Parliament may cease to be in its present form.

I dont think there is anything whatsoever to worry about.
Brexit will go through parliament no problem and at least there may be some debate about how this change may affect the country, which is absolutely right.
The alternative was for an unelected prime minister, with HER cabinet, doing whatever they wanted, which was just wrong.
There is no way that Brexit will not happen and after all, the "style" of Brexit was never talked about or agreed by anyone, just that we would exit the EU.
And IF that fails, people can get rid of their local MP, who has an obligation to carry out their constituents' wishes.

No point getting excited, it's part of the British democracy, the thing that everyone voted for.

Just keep your fingers crossed that their cant be an appeal later on to the European court ??