.........www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... s-gay.html Raises some interesting points.

.........www.dailymail.co.uk/health/artic ... s-gay.html Raises some interesting points.

Yes, that was one of the points that came to my mind along with the only recently dropped idea that male homosexuality was as a result of medical / brain issues. Arguably, this 'proves' those old theories? Also, I wondered why he allegedly felt obliged to give up his job to take up the cliched gay job of hairdresser?

It's been a while since you brought this old chestnut up.

Thats two links that Dally has provided with pictures of "bikini clad Cat Deeley enjoys girlie holiday in Hawaii", one a transexual MP and the other a homosexual ex-rugby playing hairdresser, I have to admit, I've clicked the Cat Deeley link twice and bollax to the main story.

But why is a near naked Ms Deeley of interest to the FeMail pages ?

Oh, I see...

Not for the likes of me at all then, I'll just have one more look though.

The DM specialises in scantily clad 'celebs' whilst at the same time taking a high moral stance on tackiness! I've given up posting about their crass hypocrisy and need to show female flesh at every opportunity. Even The Sun's website doesn't get close.

Only if your definition of the word 'proves' is entirely fooked up.

It doesn't disprove them.

Not disproving something is not synonymous with proving it. For example, the fact that I prefer to poo in my own toilet than in a public convenience doesn't disprove the existence of Santa Claus.

How many gyms are also fields?

Why bring Santa Claus in to it?

Go on, give us a laugh ... how does it "arguably" 'prove' those old theories?

Why not? It was merely an example to demonstrate how not disproving something is not the same as proving it.

well actually no, a better example would be "my shirt isn't red, this doesn't prove its yellow" your just lowering your own argument with stupidity.

more to the point would be, if he had a stroke and it caused a reaction in his nerve patterns altering his mindset as is supposed to happen this would then be proof of a mental affliction for homosexuality, but as there have been no case studies and this process wasn't monitored by a machine such as an MRI scanner to note his brain wave patterns then that can't be proved either.

It isn't a case of yes or no so proving or disproving do not come into it, such as the colour example above, there are more than two scenario's so it could be anything.