All what is being described as SARS COV2 has to be reported by ALL medical persons, a positive test is NOT an infection, it cannot be, it's a diagnostic tool. Thus causative agents that cause infection have to be reported, that means there is hardly any actual infections, fewer than 13,900 up until week 53 which includes part of January.. week 53 had only 37 true reports of cases with a causative agent that are described as SARS COV2 (which was 'isolated' described by using a computer algorithm so doesn't truly exist as a 'novel' virus as you're just filing in sequences into a batch of other RNA that we know exists in every human being on the planet.

The numbers being used by the government and media are a lie, and always have been, they are not and cannot be infections or deaths of/From etc, they are cases which are meaningless crud, the R number and the deaths are being criminally based upon this BS to force through medical treatments, remove human rights, garner more control over the populace and much more disgusting actions that only benefit the elites and harm the plebs!

First week of December 2019 55.8% of the primary care influenza tests were infectious, had actual live infection, in secondary care it was just under 19%, this can be found on the ILI weekly report. 2019 was a very 'soft' flu season.
Live infection of the alleged novel virus are 0.55% of the positive cases, this aligns with the lab testing in France which found lower than 3% of live material at 35x amplification cycles of the 250,000+ tests they'd done, UK government does somewhere between 40-45 cycles hence the more you amplify the higher the false positives, so with that high number of of cycles the false positives of the 'cases' are nearer 100% of the cases. Which again is what will happen when the RNA you are looking for is there in all humans, at circa 60 cycles everyone on the planet would test positive.

That there is a 90-96% efficacy claim for the 'vaccine' - it cannot legally be called a vaccine as it simply isn't, it's basically a more insidious version of Tamiflu, is just dumb science, you've actually a lower efficacy rate than the actual false positive rate of 'positives' and the medical treatment doesn't nor cannot stop infection/transmission nor indeed prevent death/hospitalisation, yet more lies.
here is the week 53 NOIDS report https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 3-2020.pdf

All what is being described as SARS COV2 has to be reported by ALL medical persons, a positive test is NOT an infection, it cannot be, it's a diagnostic tool. Thus causative agents that cause infection have to be reported, that means there is hardly any actual infections, fewer than 13,900 up until week 53 which includes part of January.. week 53 had only 37 true reports of cases with a causative agent that are described as SARS COV2 (which was 'isolated' described by using a computer algorithm so doesn't truly exist as a 'novel' virus as you're just filing in sequences into a batch of other RNA that we know exists in every human being on the planet.

The numbers being used by the government and media are a lie, and always have been, they are not and cannot be infections or deaths of/From etc, they are cases which are meaningless crud, the R number and the deaths are being criminally based upon this BS to force through medical treatments, remove human rights, garner more control over the populace and much more disgusting actions that only benefit the elites and harm the plebs!

First week of December 2019 55.8% of the primary care influenza tests were infectious, had actual live infection, in secondary care it was just under 19%, this can be found on the ILI weekly report. 2019 was a very 'soft' flu season.
Live infection of the alleged novel virus are 0.55% of the positive cases, this aligns with the lab testing in France which found lower than 3% of live material at 35x amplification cycles of the 250,000+ tests they'd done, UK government does somewhere between 40-45 cycles hence the more you amplify the higher the false positives, so with that high number of of cycles the false positives of the 'cases' are nearer 100% of the cases. Which again is what will happen when the RNA you are looking for is there in all humans, at circa 60 cycles everyone on the planet would test positive.

That there is a 90-96% efficacy claim for the 'vaccine' - it cannot legally be called a vaccine as it simply isn't, it's basically a more insidious version of Tamiflu, is just dumb science, you've actually a lower efficacy rate than the actual false positive rate of 'positives' and the medical treatment doesn't nor cannot stop infection/transmission nor indeed prevent death/hospitalisation, yet more lies.
here is the week 53 NOIDS report https://assets.publishing.service.gov.u ... 3-2020.pdf

So, if it's all make believe, why are they doing it and what do you think they want as a result?

So, if it's all make believe, why are they doing it and what do you think they want as a result?

THIS IS JUST COMPLETE PSEUDO SCIENCE DESIGNED TO CONFUSE , UNDERMINE AND SOW DOUBT. EG the section below

That there is a 90-96% efficacy claim for the 'vaccine' - it cannot legally be called a vaccine as it simply isn't, it's basically a more insidious version of Tamiflu, is just dumb science


This is just rubbish the vaccines designed are to stimulate the body to recognise Covid infection and help the body to fight it. It is exactly the same as vaccinating against measles or smallpox Tamiflu is pretty much a medicine like ibuprofen tamiflu is a neuraminidase inhibitor, a competitive inhibitor of influenza's neuraminidase enzyme. The enzyme cleaves the sialic acid which is found on glycoproteins on the surface of human cells that helps new virions to exit the cell. Thus tamiflu prevents new viral particles from being released.

There is no comparison at all between the vaccines and tamiflu. It is the equivalent of saying that giving paracetomol to cure a headache is the same as doing a lobotomy

THIS IS JUST COMPLETE PSEUDO SCIENCE DESIGNED TO CONFUSE , UNDERMINE AND SOW DOUBT. EG the section below

That there is a 90-96% efficacy claim for the 'vaccine' - it cannot legally be called a vaccine as it simply isn't, it's basically a more insidious version of Tamiflu, is just dumb science


This is just rubbish the vaccines designed are to stimulate the body to recognise Covid infection and help the body to fight it. It is exactly the same as vaccinating against measles or smallpox Tamiflu is pretty much a medicine like ibuprofen tamiflu is a neuraminidase inhibitor, a competitive inhibitor of influenza's neuraminidase enzyme. The enzyme cleaves the sialic acid which is found on glycoproteins on the surface of human cells that helps new virions to exit the cell. Thus tamiflu prevents new viral particles from being released.

There is no comparison at all between the vaccines and tamiflu. It is the equivalent of saying that giving paracetomol to cure a headache is the same as doing a lobotomy