Isn't it odd how all the TV aerials in my area point towards Emley Moor transmitter and yet all the Satelite dishes point at near right angles to them in what could only be described as a direction of 28.2 degrees East. Exactly where the SKY Satellite is supposed to be. Clever these NWO people aren't they, hiding an invisible TV Transmitter on the hills between here and Sheffield.

Not even NASA can provide an authentic Working Satellite, i always knew you couldn't.

As your good luck would have it, one of the working satellites, and not even a NASA one, the International Space Station, will be passing overhead in full view all the next week. Any ISS prediction program or app will forewarn you of the precise times and path at your location, and all you need is a reasonably clear sky.

The brightest imminent pass will be next Wednesday, but you can see it every evening, even tonight low in the South for a short distance.

Here is a chart showing what you'll see, (next Wednesday) with rise, peak and disappearance times. The main stars are clearly mapped and I've pointed a red arrow at the spot where the ISS will cross into the Earth's shadow and rapidly fade out of view.



Enjoy! And then try to make up some ludicrous alternative explanation.

[iThat doesn't prove anything. Like i said they're separate to the Tv feed. Also built up areas wouldn't use the same masts for obvious reasons Most Terrestrial Aeries point towards Winter Hill in the Manchester area. Just incase you haven't noticed there are Communication Masts Everywhere. Where i live the Sky dishes point towards a known mast in the Trafford Park area. The EMF count is off the scale where its located. I should know i carried out Fire Risk Assessments there.Obviously i can't account for everyones TV feed but just to prove the terrestrial TV signal is still analogue fed, when the digital switchover happened nobody had to switch aerials. The Digibox or your in built in Freeview TV transforms the analogue to Digital exactly the same with Sky. Simples[/i.

:1gjgsytz
:1gjgsytz[i:1gjgsytzHahaha Whats That wheres the authentic working Satellite picture that's PACMAN. Its a CGI illustration[/i:1gjgsytz:1gjgsytz.


:1gjgsytz[i:1gjgsytzHow can anybody take you serious. I didn't ask for illustrations. Mugwumps right your photo analysis is shocking.[/i:1gjgsytz:1gjgsytz

Ferocious Aardvark Wrote:" As your good luck would have it, one of the working satellites'"

What are you even going on about Stan?

You can't be this stupid surely?

You go on and play toy soldiers Mr infantry man. You know nothing.

Quite the ego you have there, Stan.

I'd suggest brushing-up on your reading comprehension, critical thinking skills, and reality before commenting on others.

Have you recently received a blow to the head?

This is ace. Next Stanley will be telling us that its impossible to see these satellites with a pair of binoculars. Protip for you Stanley, buy a pair and try it yourself. Not a telescope, its more difficult with a telescope. Just some half decent binoculars. You may even see that glass roof, 100km above the earth

Regards

King James

You do realise that he thinks the ISS is a hologram?

If you're prepared to go to those kind of lengths to preserve your original lie, nothing will be off limits when it comes to explanations.

Checking this thread's progress is now one of the highlights of my day.