Care to tell me all the questions you've failed to divulge , you can't even prove a globe without using NASA fakery. Ha with the moon question regarding Australia look up the word perspectives. Hope this message doesn't get deleted.

Any answer to my previous question about Concorde? How do you explain all the passenger photos taken of the Earth's curvature? Are they all really NASA fakes?

I believe you mentioned the Earth did not spin? Given that view, how do you explain the aberration of light and does your explanation (mathematical or otherwise) explain observation as well as the conventional model?

I am educated enough to actually understand the word "perspectives" without the need to look it up. And if I did, there would be nothing about the moon in any dictionary definition.

Anyway I didn't ask for a cryptic hint. I just want your basic, straightforward explanation.

If you have one.

My straightforward explanation is that due to the earth being a globe, "up" in the UK is a different direction to "up" in Australia as gravity pulls us in towards the centre of the earth. So, "up" is a subjective experience depending where on the globe I am.

What's yours?

Provide the pictures of curvature, I can guarantee a curve in the glass. No curvature in this one

Nah, the flatearthsocienty have doctored that one. CGIed it. I don't believe that picture is real.

Would that apply is Australia was on the bottom-side of a flat Earth of significant mass and the UK on the top-side?

The difficulty in the OP's assertion seems to me to come from what happens around the edges of the flat Earth?

[urlhttp://www.harriemotorhome.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Concorde-in-flight.jpg[/url

Scientific evidence The Bedfordshire level experiment

[urlhttps://youtu.be/IDSM_ohW-hY[/url

If you can't tell the difference between land and clouds then your gormcloptitude is clearly limitless.

Ha ha the horizon you mean. Always at eye level proving a flat earth.