|
FORUMS > The Sin Bin > Flat as a Pancake |
|
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 78 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2015 | 9 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
74477_1446573432.jpg In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_74477.jpg |
|
|
Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "I treid booking it. I picked a random date (next Friday). I chose direct flights only. It was a pice of mickeyhttp://i.imgur.com/HmK5Hza.png" >
Flight review from someone who's done it
Ha ha ha your response is pathetic. I really don’t know why i’m replying, THAT’S a pre-booking page.THE HOAX lie’s behind the booking. My 5 year old daughter found every travel agent containing that flight when we researched this You’re not delving deep enough into these flights. And this is why I shouldn't be answering. Look at the 2 top flights on your evidence THEY TAKE OFF AT THE SAME TIME As I stated yesterday Ha ha. They're fake.
Once you’ve actually BOOKED the flight this is where the fun starts, eg you’ll get told the flight is overbooked or theres some other problem regarding the flight / plane etc. That’s when the alternative’s come in offering all types of different connections. It seems that you ONLY understand simple logic and your so - called research is abysmal almost CHILD like producing yet again NO SUBSTANCE.
You also mentioned tripadviser testimonies. Well your really clutching at straws with that one, that proves everything its laughable. Did them passengers on those flights write about how close they got to the Antarctic and were able (during THE LARGEST PART of these flights) to see the polar icebergs and Antarctic land (also), if not, then there is something wrong with their flight-routes .. Its a fake flight. I’ve already researched it try tracking the flights. AIl southern hemisphere planes disappear within 1 hour off take off over the ocean. Then magically re-appear an hour before they land, it absolutely stinks of misinformation. Care to tell me why ?
You sure that this flight is a NON-STOP flight?
It seems to me that i have spotted at least two take off
I am watching right now, at 3 different flight radars, and i don't see any flight whatsoever between SA - Africa - Australia...
You have to see these tables
rlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-stop_flightrl
In these tables you won't find even one single flight between SA - Africa - Australia...
Now, try to figure out next few facts and then combine them in one entirety:
1. No flights across Antarctica
2. Passengers on alleged NON-STOP flights between Australia and South America are not able to see Antarctica...
3. Flight Radars show no flights between SA - Africa - Australia
4. There isn't one single NON-STOP flight in tables above between SA - Africa - Australia
This video is very interesting, i suggest you to watch this video carefully (even if you have already watched it before) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... RWL4#t=287 This Proves ALL plane routes are riddled to fit the globe. When its transferred to the Azimuthal map, you can see why they fly these weird routes.
But do some plane searches between Chile, Argentina, New Zealand, South Africa, and Australia, you will be astounded at what you will find! All with stop overs, and if you find a direct flight (very rare) the duration in the air doesn't add up.
I See you have skipped this part: As usual you don’t delve DEEP enough.
FACT A Boeing 777 has a cruising speed of 640 miles/hour = 1024 km/h7400 miles (11840 km) comes in at around 12 hours. Try to find this route.It doesn't exist. It can't!
The closest i came was a one connection flight with a 3 hours layover.
The total flight time was 20 hours.20 hours, take away 3 hours, it's 17 hours, not 12 hours
Go ahead, try yourself...You may find 1 NON-STOP (flight), but even then, the strangeness doesn't end there, because the speed is wrong...17 (hours) * 1024 km/h = 17 408 km, NOT 11 800 km. ITS NT EVEN FLOWN, THIS WAS JUST INFO OF AN ATTEMPT OF BOOKING THE FLIGHT
I received an email today explaining about this subject and they wanted to remain anonymous to which I truly respect. They wanted me to paste this.
Hi! This is an excellent video! Where did you find that John Travolta clip? So funny. If I may add just 3 things, please: First of all real passengers testify that a supposed non-stop flight from Johannesburg to Sao Paulo (and back) has a re-fuel stop in Dakar, Senegal. Secondly, supposed non-stop flight listed as such from Perth to Johannesburg have a re-fuel stop in Cocos Islands. And thirdly once I was trying to book that non-stop flight from Auckland to Santiago on Quantas airlines and I made a false name and address and everything just so the system would allow me to go through, to pass that, and I came to the point where it asked me for my credit card number.... However, and this is very important to understand, that real passengers, who purchased such tickets (Auckland/Sydney - Santiago) non-stop, testify that they either stopped to refuel on some Pacific islands and the excuse was the bad weather conditions, OR even when they ARRIVED AS THE FIRST ONES AT THE AIRPORT AT THE CHECK IN POINT, they were told that the flight is unfortunately OVERBOOKED and they were given new tickets when the plane officially stopped in LAX, or Dallas, Texas or Vancouver and then of course Auckland to Sydney for example. And I've made an extensive research about it and this is what is happening here. Yes, I agree those flight are fake, but they have to sell them from time to time to keep this deception going. Thank for making those videos and educating people on this subject. You are making an excellent job and even fighting with those zombies and trolls.. Keep up the good work! Please copy and paste this and post it, but leave my details out. I’ve not got the patience to deal with the “sheeple” I would rather you deal with them. LOL.
Great See The word is spreading. The truth always comes out in the end. I expect another non substantial reply.
|
|
Quote: Ferocious Aardvark "I treid booking it. I picked a random date (next Friday). I chose direct flights only. It was a pice of mickeyhttp://i.imgur.com/HmK5Hza.png" >
Flight review from someone who's done it
Ha ha ha your response is pathetic. I really don’t know why i’m replying, THAT’S a pre-booking page.THE HOAX lie’s behind the booking. My 5 year old daughter found every travel agent containing that flight when we researched this You’re not delving deep enough into these flights. And this is why I shouldn't be answering. Look at the 2 top flights on your evidence THEY TAKE OFF AT THE SAME TIME As I stated yesterday Ha ha. They're fake.
Once you’ve actually BOOKED the flight this is where the fun starts, eg you’ll get told the flight is overbooked or theres some other problem regarding the flight / plane etc. That’s when the alternative’s come in offering all types of different connections. It seems that you ONLY understand simple logic and your so - called research is abysmal almost CHILD like producing yet again NO SUBSTANCE.
You also mentioned tripadviser testimonies. Well your really clutching at straws with that one, that proves everything its laughable. Did them passengers on those flights write about how close they got to the Antarctic and were able (during THE LARGEST PART of these flights) to see the polar icebergs and Antarctic land (also), if not, then there is something wrong with their flight-routes .. Its a fake flight. I’ve already researched it try tracking the flights. AIl southern hemisphere planes disappear within 1 hour off take off over the ocean. Then magically re-appear an hour before they land, it absolutely stinks of misinformation. Care to tell me why ?
You sure that this flight is a NON-STOP flight?
It seems to me that i have spotted at least two take off
I am watching right now, at 3 different flight radars, and i don't see any flight whatsoever between SA - Africa - Australia...
You have to see these tables
rlhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Non-stop_flightrl
In these tables you won't find even one single flight between SA - Africa - Australia...
Now, try to figure out next few facts and then combine them in one entirety:
1. No flights across Antarctica
2. Passengers on alleged NON-STOP flights between Australia and South America are not able to see Antarctica...
3. Flight Radars show no flights between SA - Africa - Australia
4. There isn't one single NON-STOP flight in tables above between SA - Africa - Australia
This video is very interesting, i suggest you to watch this video carefully (even if you have already watched it before) : https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=p ... RWL4#t=287 This Proves ALL plane routes are riddled to fit the globe. When its transferred to the Azimuthal map, you can see why they fly these weird routes.
But do some plane searches between Chile, Argentina, New Zealand, South Africa, and Australia, you will be astounded at what you will find! All with stop overs, and if you find a direct flight (very rare) the duration in the air doesn't add up.
I See you have skipped this part: As usual you don’t delve DEEP enough.
FACT A Boeing 777 has a cruising speed of 640 miles/hour = 1024 km/h7400 miles (11840 km) comes in at around 12 hours. Try to find this route.It doesn't exist. It can't!
The closest i came was a one connection flight with a 3 hours layover.
The total flight time was 20 hours.20 hours, take away 3 hours, it's 17 hours, not 12 hours
Go ahead, try yourself...You may find 1 NON-STOP (flight), but even then, the strangeness doesn't end there, because the speed is wrong...17 (hours) * 1024 km/h = 17 408 km, NOT 11 800 km. ITS NT EVEN FLOWN, THIS WAS JUST INFO OF AN ATTEMPT OF BOOKING THE FLIGHT
I received an email today explaining about this subject and they wanted to remain anonymous to which I truly respect. They wanted me to paste this.
Hi! This is an excellent video! Where did you find that John Travolta clip? So funny. If I may add just 3 things, please: First of all real passengers testify that a supposed non-stop flight from Johannesburg to Sao Paulo (and back) has a re-fuel stop in Dakar, Senegal. Secondly, supposed non-stop flight listed as such from Perth to Johannesburg have a re-fuel stop in Cocos Islands. And thirdly once I was trying to book that non-stop flight from Auckland to Santiago on Quantas airlines and I made a false name and address and everything just so the system would allow me to go through, to pass that, and I came to the point where it asked me for my credit card number.... However, and this is very important to understand, that real passengers, who purchased such tickets (Auckland/Sydney - Santiago) non-stop, testify that they either stopped to refuel on some Pacific islands and the excuse was the bad weather conditions, OR even when they ARRIVED AS THE FIRST ONES AT THE AIRPORT AT THE CHECK IN POINT, they were told that the flight is unfortunately OVERBOOKED and they were given new tickets when the plane officially stopped in LAX, or Dallas, Texas or Vancouver and then of course Auckland to Sydney for example. And I've made an extensive research about it and this is what is happening here. Yes, I agree those flight are fake, but they have to sell them from time to time to keep this deception going. Thank for making those videos and educating people on this subject. You are making an excellent job and even fighting with those zombies and trolls.. Keep up the good work! Please copy and paste this and post it, but leave my details out. I’ve not got the patience to deal with the “sheeple” I would rather you deal with them. LOL.
Great See The word is spreading. The truth always comes out in the end. I expect another non substantial reply.
|
|
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Club Captain | 78 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Oct 2015 | 9 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Nov 2015 | Nov 2015 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
74477_1446573432.jpg In my lexicon, NASA stands for: Nazi And Space Actor. If you ever ensued to start poking around NASA the Apollo moon landings, a keen eye & open mind will bring you to the conclusion that it was a staged hoax. In fact the pure hard scientific evidence & analysis irrevocably reveals the fraud among many. Think about it, the greatest feat accomplished by man is an elaborate Hollywood production that cost the US taxpayer a cool 30 billion. Imagine what JC could create with that, it pisses me off more that NASA has built up a money-sucking colossus composed of lies, hoaxes and misinformation. The US taxpayer derives virtually no benefit from NASA'S existence & alleged scientific contributions derived by supposed explorations & experiments in space. Absent of any other sources to verify, we have had to prostate ourselves to the so-called "experts" despite irrefutable evidence that NASA's nothing more than an elaborate financial embezzler & pseudoscience peddler:d7dc4b20b2c2dd7b76ac6eac29d5604e_74477.jpg |
|
| Quote: Stand-Offish "I can't believe our learned friend from Bradford has got sucked into this nonsense.'"
What a bellend getting sucked in.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Administrator | 25122 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | May 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
7.gif :7.gif |
|
| I think we've all had enough of this now.
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 100140 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Fish/PDT_Fish_35.gif :Fish/PDT_Fish_35.gif |
Moderator
|
| I'll also add that other posters are not happy with the homophobic stuff which is a breach of the AUP and as such a short break will be in order next time.
| | | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Administrator | 25122 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Dec 2001 | 23 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Jul 2017 | May 2017 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
7.gif :7.gif |
|
| Quote: Wanderer "I'll also add that other posters are not happy with the homophobic stuff which is a breach of the AUP and as such a short break will be in order next time.'"
I'm afraid theearthisflat skipped the short break whilst passing GO and went straight to hard time without parole. .
| | |
|
Rank | Posts | Team |
Moderator | 100140 | No Team Selected |
Joined | Service | Reputation |
Sep 2002 | 22 years | |
Online | Last Post | Last Page |
Oct 2024 | Oct 2024 | LINK |
Milestone Posts |
|
Milestone Years |
|
Location |
|
Signature |
Fish/PDT_Fish_35.gif :Fish/PDT_Fish_35.gif |
Moderator
|
| Quote: Mugwump "I'm afraid theearthisflat skipped the short break whilst passing GO and went straight to hard time without parole. .
Fine by me
| | |
| |
|
All views expressed are those of the author and not necessarily those of the RLFANS.COM or its subsites.
Whilst every effort is made to ensure that news stories, articles and images are correct, we cannot be held responsible for errors. However, if you feel any material on this website is copyrighted or incorrect in any way please contact us using the link at the top of the page so we can remove it or negotiate copyright permission.
RLFANS.COM, the owners of this website, is not responsible for the content of its sub-sites or posts, please email the author of this sub-site or post if you feel you find an article offensive or of a choice nature that you disagree with.
Copyright 1999 - 2024 RLFANS.COM
You must be 18+ to gamble, for more information and for help with gambling issues see https://www.begambleaware.org/.
Please Support RLFANS.COM
4.1787109375:5
|
|
POSTS | ONLINE | REGISTRATIONS | RECORD | 19.64M +1 | 3,293 ↑126 | 80,131 | 14,103 |
| LOGIN HERE or REGISTER for more features!.
When you register you get access to the live match scores, live match chat and you can post in the discussions on the forums.
|
RLFANS Match Centre
Mens Betfred Super League XXVIII ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Hull KR |
28 |
729 |
335 |
394 |
44 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Wigan |
27 |
721 |
336 |
385 |
44 |
Warrington |
29 |
769 |
351 |
418 |
42 |
Leigh |
28 |
580 |
404 |
176 |
33 |
Salford |
28 |
556 |
561 |
-5 |
32 |
St.Helens |
28 |
618 |
411 |
207 |
30 |
|
Catalans |
27 |
475 |
427 |
48 |
30 |
Leeds |
27 |
530 |
488 |
42 |
28 |
Huddersfield |
27 |
468 |
658 |
-190 |
20 |
Castleford |
27 |
425 |
735 |
-310 |
15 |
Hull FC |
27 |
328 |
894 |
-566 |
6 |
LondonB |
27 |
317 |
916 |
-599 |
6 |
Betfred Championship 2024 ROUND : 1 | | PLD | F | A | DIFF | PTS |
Wakefield |
26 |
1010 |
262 |
748 |
50 |
This is an inplay table and live positions can change.
Toulouse |
25 |
744 |
368 |
376 |
35 |
Bradford |
26 |
678 |
387 |
291 |
34 |
York |
27 |
655 |
469 |
186 |
30 |
Widnes |
26 |
551 |
475 |
76 |
29 |
Featherstone |
26 |
622 |
500 |
122 |
28 |
|
Sheffield |
26 |
626 |
526 |
100 |
28 |
Doncaster |
26 |
498 |
619 |
-121 |
25 |
Halifax |
26 |
509 |
650 |
-141 |
22 |
Batley |
26 |
422 |
591 |
-169 |
22 |
Barrow |
25 |
442 |
720 |
-278 |
19 |
Swinton |
27 |
474 |
670 |
-196 |
18 |
Whitehaven |
25 |
437 |
826 |
-389 |
18 |
Dewsbury |
27 |
348 |
879 |
-531 |
4 |
|