The LHA was a needs based system, which is exactly the same as the 'bedroom tax'. Size of property & number of rooms according to actual need.

Remarkably tenants who did move were allowed to keep the difference between what they were paid in housing benefits & what they paid to their landlord. So their was no actual saving on the benefits bill.

Both policies were about resource allocation. The right number of rooms being allocated on the basis of actual need.

How much Labour saved on the benefits bill by allowing tenants to keep any reduction in rent they achieved from their 'profiteering' private landlords?

How many people actually moved home as a result of the LHA?

And income and corporation tax are both policies about raising revenue for the government. Doesn't mean they're the same thing.

Seems the queen was happy about the 'no' vote

Its a shame she cant afford her own telly. Or did he ring her before she went to bed?

Quite a number actually, but don't let facts get in your way, they haven't troubled you thus far.