Quote: Him "Once again, how does the arrest of an officer who wasn't present and didn't contribute in any way to the police log affect the credibility or validity of the police log?
Which parts of the log are now in doubt and why?
For some reason none of the Tory apologists can answer this question.'"
You are quite right. They have him bang to rights.
It's quite normal pretend to be a witness just to make sure. Normal police procedures I suppose.
Well normal if you are a police apologist? I suppose the fabrication of evidence isn't an issue anymore.