Now Now coddy don't bring her into it we could go on for ten thousand pages for and against this stick to the topic 26k capped is what we want to talk about.

For the record seeing as you have said one this about her i will to.

She brings in far more to this country in revenue from wide variety of things then they will ever take out and the charity most of them do far out ways any mistakes they have made as well.

Complete cobblers and you know it.

Oh come on.

You are not seriously telling me that you don't think there are people who do this?

Honestly are you?

Because if you are then you are either naive in the extreme or arguing for the sake of it.

Do they need DLA too?

No it isn't.

1. Keep housing in the public sector and pay for the upkeep/repairs

2. Sell house off, gain money from initial sale, don't pay for upkeep/repairs.

Explain why it's cobblers please.

Your comprehension skills need a polish if you think that is what I said.

and the charity most of them do far out ways any mistakes they have made as well


Yep. I don't think we appreciate just how rare and appealing this is to tourists.

1. This thing called rent paid for the repairs and upkeep it even paid for new homes to be built, remember that the vast amount of social housing at the time was used by those in work.

2. No it went to keep the failed poll tax (another example of social engineering) low for the rich in their big homes.

If you maintain that selling off the housing stock was not social engineering then you don't know what social engineering is.

I do apologise, I thought u said




Then again I must admit I am shattered, having worked 13 hours today in order to keep my job and provide the tax revenue so that some non-work can squeeze another kid out and get more money for her smokes.......

1. Council rent rarely did. Especially in London with the GLC
2. Poll Tax wasn't social engineering. It was about what the Tories (and me for the record) considered fairness. Very simple, you pay in line with what you take. More people = more strain on resources e.g. more rubbish generated, more use of libraries etc

Nothing at all wrong with this imo.

I think it is you who needs to look up the definition of social engineering.

Sorry, I thought I'd included an all in that sentence. It was meant to read

Why is it you and your ilk always think that all these families have set out to live on benefits and milk the system